The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tangible Industry 4.0: A Scenario-Based Approach to Learning for the Future of Production
Open accessAbstract
Industry is currently undergoing a transformation towards full digitalization and intelligentization of manufacturing processes. Visionary but quite realistic concepts such as the Internet of Things, Industrial Internet, Cloud-based Manufacturing and Smart Manufacturing are drivers of the so called Fourth Industrial Revolution which is commonly referred to as Industry 4.0. Although a common agreement exists on the necessity for technological advancement of production technologies and business models in the sense of Industry 4.0, a major obstacle lies in the perceived complexity and abstractness which partly hinders its quick transformation into industrial practice. To overcome these burdens, we suggest a Scenario-based Industry 4.0 Learning Factory concept that we are currently planning to implement in Austria's first Industry 4.0 Pilot Factory. The concept is built upon a tentative competency model for Industry 4.0 and the use of scenarios for problem-oriented learning of future production engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The global Industry 4.0 initiative is centered around the integration of AI at nearly every level to drive predictive maintenance, future business strategies, and floor production, with humans working alongside AI to make vital decisions for the company (Erol et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2015; Mabkhot et al., 2018; Omron, 2020).”
From Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2022) · cites this paper as Erol et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034 · Cited by 1,352
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 · Cited by 1,281
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2022) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 695
Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375 · Cited by 316
Moving towards digitalization: A multiple case study in manufacturing
Zangiacomi, A., Pessot, E., Fornasiero, R., Bertetti, M., & Sacco, M. (2020) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1631468 · Cited by 280
Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0
Agostini, L., & Filippini, R. (2019) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-02-2018-0030 · Cited by 276
Problems with the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Enterprises from the SME Sector
Ingaldi, M., & Ulewicz, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12010217 · Cited by 211
Queiroz, M. M., Fosso Wamba, S., Machado, M. C., & Telles, R. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-03-2019-0134 · Cited by 114
A fuzzy synthetic evaluation of the challenges of smart city development in developing countries
Aghimien, D. O., Aigbavboa, C., Edwards, D. J., Mahamadu, A.-M., Olomolaiye, P., Nash, H., & Onyia, M. (2022) · Smart and Sustainable Built Environment · doi:10.1108/sasbe-06-2020-0092 · Cited by 94
HRM 4.0 and New Managerial Competences Profile: The COMAU Case
Fregnan, E., Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578251 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W.
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 13-18
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2538102286
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
