The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond
Open accessAbstract
With rapid advancements in industry, technology and applications, many concepts have emerged in manufacturing. It is generally known that the far-sighted term ‘Industry 4.0’ was published to highlight a new industrial revolution. Many manufacturing organizations and companies are researching this topic. However, the achievement criteria of Industry 4.0 are as yet uncertain. In addition, the technology roadmap of accomplishing Industry 4.0 is still not clear in industry nor in academia to date. This paper focuses on the fundamental conception of Industry 4.0 and the state of current manufacturing systems. It also identifies the research gaps between current manufacturing systems and Industry 4.0 requirements. The major contribution is an implementation structure of Industry 4.0, consisting of a multi-layered framework is described, and is shown how it can assist people in understanding and achieving the requirements of Industry 4.0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 · Cited by 5,113
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276
Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., & Van Brussel, H. (1999) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63232-6 · Cited by 2,034
Macduffie, J. P. (1995) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979399504800201 · Cited by 1,809
Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/ieem.2014.7058728 · Cited by 909
SmartFactory—Towards a factory-of-things
Zuehlke, D. (2010) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.02.008 · Cited by 645
Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review
Pentek, M., & Otto, B. (2015) · Cited by 619
Industry 4.0 - Potentials for Creating Smart Products: Empirical Research Results
Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R.-C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19027-3_2 · Cited by 559
Applications of agent-based systems in intelligent manufacturing: An updated review
Shen, W., Hao, Q., Yoon, H. J., & Norrie, D. H. (2006) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2006.05.004 · Cited by 554
Smart Factory - A Step towards the Next Generation of Manufacturing
Lucke, D., Constantinescu, C., & Westkämper, E. (2008) · Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-267-8_23 · Cited by 366
Cyber-physical Systems Architecture for Self-Aware Machines in Industry 4.0 Environment
Bagheri, B., Yang, S., Kao, H.-A., & Lee, J. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318 · Cited by 361
Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., & Verl, A. (2015) · Production Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11740-014-0586-3 · Cited by 324
Lee, J. (2015) · Informatik-Spektrum · doi:10.1007/s00287-015-0891-z · Cited by 164
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J., & Hellinger, A. (2013) · Cited by 87
Industry 4.0: A Best Practice Project of the Automotive Industry
Gruber, F. E. (2013) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41329-2_5 · Cited by 34
Cause the Trend Industry 4.0 in the Automated Industry to New Requirements on User Interfaces?
Wittenberg, C. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_24 · Cited by 30
Cyber physical system for vehicle application
Nawa, K., Chandrasiri, N. P., Yanagihara, T., & Oguchi, K. (2013) · Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · doi:10.1177/0142331213510018 · Cited by 19
Cited by
Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 · Cited by 3,221
Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues
Lu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005 · Cited by 3,012
The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · Cited by 2,201
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 · Cited by 1,440
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R.
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 173-178
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2513195681
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 118.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
