Cited by 257Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyDigital Transformation in IndustryArtificial Intelligence Applications

Systematic review on machine learning (ML) methods for manufacturing processes–Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) methods for field application

Open access
Fahle, Simon, Prinz, Christopher, Kuhlenkötter, Bernd·2020·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and especially machine learning (ML) become increasingly more frequently applicable in factory operations. This paper presents a systematic review of today’s applications of ML techniques in the factory environment. The utilization of ML methods related to manufacturing process planning and control, predictive maintenance, quality control, in situ process control and optimization, logistics, robotics, assistance and learning systems for shopfloor employees are being analyzed. Moreover, an overview of ML training concepts in learning factories is given. Furthermore, these concepts will be analyzed regarding the implemented ML method. Finally, research gaps are identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robotics is used to automate tasks in manufacturing plants, such as assembly line tasks, painting, and welding.

    “Robotics is used to automate tasks in manufacturing plants, such as assembly line tasks, painting, and welding.”

    From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    Section 4.5 (Robotics; page not provided) describes robotics applications for automation and discusses assembly use cases. It does not say that robots perform assembly-line tasks, painting, or welding in manufacturing plants. Section 4.8 discusses laser welding, but not robotic welding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AI and ML algorithms are used to optimize robotic operations in manufacturing, such as improving the efficiency and accuracy of movements.

    “AI and ML algorithms are used to optimize the robotic operations, such as improving the efficiency and accuracy of movements [2] .”

    From Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    Section 4.5 (Robotics; page not provided) describes ML approaches for robotic tasks, including improved cloth-manipulation results and energy-efficient path planning. It does not report improved accuracy of robot movements, and it presents energy-efficient planning as an objective rather than a demonstrated efficiency gain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Robots can detect and interact with their surroundings, make judgments, and carry out difficult tasks with the aid of AI.

    “Robots can detect and interact with their surroundings, make judgments, and carry out difficult tasks with the aid of AI. [2] .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bajic, B., Cosic, I., Lazarevic, M., Sremcev, N., Rikalovic, A., 2018. Machine Learning Techniques for Smart Manufacturing: Applications and Challenges in Industry 4.0. 9th International Scientific and Expert Conference TEAM 2018.
  2. Harding, J.A., Shahbaz, M., Srinivas, Kusiak, A., 2006. Data Mining in Manufacturing: A Review. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 128 (4), 969-976.
  3. Köksal, G., Batmaz, İ., Testik, M.C., 2011. A review of data mining applications for quality improvement in manufacturing industry. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (10), 13448-13467.
  4. Leo Kumar, S.P., 2017. State of The Art-Intense Review on Artificial Intelligence Systems Application in Process Planning and Manufactu- ring. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 65, 294-329.
  5. Monostori, L., Markus, A., van Brussel, H., Westkämpfer, E., 1996. Machine Learning Approaches to Manufacturing. CIRP Annals 45 (2), 675-712.
  6. Wuest, T., Weimer, D., Irgens, C., Thoben, K.-D., 2016. Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications. Production & Manufacturing Research 4 (1), 23-45.
  7. Ma, L., Xie, W., Zhang, Y., 2019. Blister Defect Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Network for Polymer Lithium-Ion Battery. Applied Sciences 9 (6), 1085.
  8. Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S., 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering -A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology 51 (1), 7-15.
  9. Loyer, J.-L., Henriques, E., Fontul, M., Wiseall, S., 2016. Comparison of Machine Learning methods applied to the estimation of manufacturing cost of jet engine components. International Journal of Production Economics 178, 109-119.
  10. Pachner, S., Miethlinger, J. Smart data analysis for optimized manufacturing of powder coatings on co-rotating twin screw extruders, in: , AIP Conference Proceedings Polymer Processing Scoiety S. 70010.
  11. Knoll, D., Prüglmeier, M., Reinhart, G., 2016. Predicting Future Inbound Logistics Processes Using Machine Learning. Proc. CIRP 52, 145-150.
  12. Liu, H., Wang, L., 2017. Human motion prediction for human-robot collaboration. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 44, 287-294.
  13. Lemmerz, K., Glogowski, Paul, Kleineberg, Phil, Hypki, A., Kuhlenkötter, B., 2019. A Hybrid Collaborative Operation for Human- Robot Interaction Supported by Machine Learning. 12th IEEE International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI).
  14. Herrmann, P.N., Kundisch, D.O., Rahman, M.S., 2015. Beating Irrationality: Does Delegating to IT Alleviate the Sunk Cost Effect? Management Science 61 (4), 831-850.
  15. Ullrich, C., Aust, M., Kreggenfeld, N., Kahl, D., Prinz, C., Schwantzer, S., 2015. Assistance and Knowledge-Services for Smart Production. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business.
  16. Mazziotti, C., Holmes, W., Wiedmann, M., Loibl, K., Rummel, N., Mavrikis, M., Hansen, A., Grawemeyer, B., 2015. Robust Student Knowledge: Adapting to Individual Student Needs as they Explore the Concepts and Practice the Procedures of Fractions. AIED Workshops.
  17. Haslgrubler, M., Gollan, B., Ferscha, A., 2018. A Cognitive Assistance Framework for Supporting Human Workers in Industrial Tasks. IT Prof. 20 (5), 48-56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fahle, S., Prinz, C., & Kuhlenkötter, B.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Fahle, Simon
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
93
Pages
413-418
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089334509
Cited by
257
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
machine learning in manufacturing, process planning, predictive maintenance, quality control, in-situ process control, process optimization, logistics, industrial robotics, learning factory, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review