Cited by 13Digital Transformation in IndustryDesign Education and PracticeEngineering Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Teaching Axiomatic Design for a Long-Term Sustainable Introduction of Industry 4.0 in SMEs

Open access
Rauch, Erwin, Brown, Christopher A.·2021·Procedia CIRP

Abstract

This work shows how to teach axiomatic design (AD) of manufacturing processes and systems in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to achieve long-term sustainability in the introduction of Industry 4.0. This is about how to develop profitable and ethical design solutions by exploiting emerging technologies, especially for companies with limited resources. Suh’s axiomatic approach to design selects the best solution among plausible candidates early in the design process so that resources can be focused most effectively. It is important that engineers know how to develop ethical design solutions efficiently and effectively. Sustainability rests on three pillars, economic, ecological and social. Therefore, ethical design can be achieved, with responsible use of natural resources and protection of the environment, meeting the needs of people and society as well as profitability to ensure long-term prosperity for all. Literature on Industry 4.0 shows several approaches on how Industry 4.0 can be sustainable and human-centered. However, few works focus on SMEs and there is little on teaching. Here, AD is used to create a program for teaching how to apply AD to design problems in the context of Industry 4.0 for SMEs. AD theory states that the best design solutions are those that, 1- maintain the independence of the functional elements, and 2- minimize the information content, i.e., maximize the probability of success. In AD, needs of customers and other stake holders are considered first, so that the right problems are addressed. Then top-down, parallel, functional-physical decompositions, are followed by physical integrations, all guided by Suh’s axioms to select the right solutions. In order to test new technologies in a practice-oriented way in advance of introduction for SMEs, learning factory laboratories are used.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.155

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Kagermann H, Helbig J, Hellinger A, Wahlster W. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion; 2013 · DOI
  2. Rauch, 2019, Requirements and Barriers for Introducing Smart Manufacturing in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 10.1109/EMR.2019.2931564 · DOI
  3. Rauch T, Tröger S.Nachhaltige Entwicklung - Die gesellschaftliche Dimension (sustainable development - the social dimension). Discussion paper for the third KMK-BMZ-conference for education in schools. 14.-15.12.2004, Bonn, 2004
  4. Rauch, 2015, Sustainability in manufacturing through distributed manufacturing systems (DMS), Procedia CIRP, 29, 544, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.069 · DOI
  5. Markman, 2016, Entrepreneurship as a platform for pursuing multiple goals: A special issue on sustainability, ethics, and entrepreneurship, Journal of Management Studies, 53, 673, 10.1111/joms.12214 · DOI
  6. Garcia-Muiña, 2018, The Paradigms of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy as Enabling Drivers for the Competitiveness of Businesses and Territories: The Case of an Italian Ceramic Tiles Manufacturing Company, Social Sciences, 7, 255, 10.3390/socsci7120255 · DOI
  7. Wolf, 2016, Balance or synergies between environment and economy—A note on model structures, Sustainability, 8, 761, 10.3390/su8080761 · DOI
  8. Brown CA. Axiomatic design for understanding manufacturing engineering as a science. In Proceedings of the 21st CIRP Design Conference, 2011.
  9. Orzes G, Rauch E, Bednar S, Poklemba R. Industry 4.0 Implementation Barriers in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Focus Group Study. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2018, pp. 1348-1352. IEEE. · DOI
  10. Schumacher, 2019, Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises, Procedia CIRP, 79, 409, 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ganzarain, 2016, Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9, 1119, 10.3926/jiem.2073 · DOI
  12. Matt DT, Rauch E, Riedl M. Knowledge Transfer and Introduction of Industry 4.0 in SMEs: A Five-Step Methodology to Introduce Industry 4.0. In: Brunet-Thornton R, Martinez F, editors. Analyzing the Impacts of Industry 4.0 in Modern Business Environments, IGI Global: Hershey, PA; 2018. p. 256-282 · DOI
  13. Paravizo, 2018, Exploring gamification to support manufacturing education on industry 4.0 as an enabler for innovation and sustainability, Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 438, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.142 · DOI
  14. Garbie, 2017, Incorporating sustainability/sustainable development concepts in teaching industrial systems design courses, Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 417, 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.053 · DOI
  15. Mourtzis, 2018, Cyber-physical systems and education 4.0-the teaching factory 4.0 concept, Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 129, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005 · DOI
  16. Stachová, 2019, External partnerships in employee education and development as the key to facing industry 4.0 challenges, Sustainability, 11, 345, 10.3390/su11020345 · DOI
  17. Chaim, 2018, Insertion of sustainability performance indicators in an industry 4.0 virtual learning environment, Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 446, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.143 · DOI
  18. Tseng TLB. Enhancement of Sustainable Manufacturing Engineering Education for Smart Generation through Workshop and Seminars. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings; 2016.
  19. Huba M, Kozák Š. From E-learning to Industry 4.0. In 2016 International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), pp. 103-108, 2016, IEEE. · DOI
  20. Brown CA.Axiomatic Design for Products, Processes and Systems. In Matt DT, Modrak V, Zsifkovits H, editors. Industry 4.0 for SMEs Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, to be published in 2019, ISBN 978-3-030-25425-4. · DOI
  21. Vickery A, Rauch E, Brown CA. Deriving Functional Requirements for Industry 4.0 from Industry’s Assessment of Needs. In Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0: Proceedings of the 25th ISPE Inc. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, July 3-6, 2018 (Vol. 7, p. 23). IOS Press. · DOI
  22. Lamancusa JS, Jorgensen JE, Zayas-Castro JL, De Ramirez LM. The Learning Factory-Integrating Design, Manufacturing and Business Realities into Engineering Curricula-a Sixth Year Report Card. International Conference on Engineering Education, 2001, pp. 6-10
  23. Rauch, 2019, AD Design Guidelines for Implementing I4. 0 Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 239, 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Rauch, E., & Brown, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Rauch, Erwin
Venue
Procedia CIRP
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
96
Pages
169-174
ISSN
2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126355231
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
axiomatic design, Industry 4.0, small and medium-sized enterprises, engineering education, sustainable design, ethical design, learning factory, manufacturing systems, technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review