The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teaching Axiomatic Design for a Long-Term Sustainable Introduction of Industry 4.0 in SMEs
Open accessAbstract
This work shows how to teach axiomatic design (AD) of manufacturing processes and systems in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to achieve long-term sustainability in the introduction of Industry 4.0. This is about how to develop profitable and ethical design solutions by exploiting emerging technologies, especially for companies with limited resources. Suh’s axiomatic approach to design selects the best solution among plausible candidates early in the design process so that resources can be focused most effectively. It is important that engineers know how to develop ethical design solutions efficiently and effectively. Sustainability rests on three pillars, economic, ecological and social. Therefore, ethical design can be achieved, with responsible use of natural resources and protection of the environment, meeting the needs of people and society as well as profitability to ensure long-term prosperity for all. Literature on Industry 4.0 shows several approaches on how Industry 4.0 can be sustainable and human-centered. However, few works focus on SMEs and there is little on teaching. Here, AD is used to create a program for teaching how to apply AD to design problems in the context of Industry 4.0 for SMEs. AD theory states that the best design solutions are those that, 1- maintain the independence of the functional elements, and 2- minimize the information content, i.e., maximize the probability of success. In AD, needs of customers and other stake holders are considered first, so that the right problems are addressed. Then top-down, parallel, functional-physical decompositions, are followed by physical integrations, all guided by Suh’s axioms to select the right solutions. In order to test new technologies in a practice-oriented way in advance of introduction for SMEs, learning factory laboratories are used.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The importance of developing innovative and efficient design solutions by leveraging emerging technologies to achieve long-term sustainability in manufacturing processes.”
From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Rauch & Brown, 2020
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Kagermann H, Helbig J, Hellinger A, Wahlster W. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion; 2013 · DOI
- Rauch, 2019, Requirements and Barriers for Introducing Smart Manufacturing in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, IEEE Engineering Management Review, 10.1109/EMR.2019.2931564 · DOI
- Rauch T, Tröger S.Nachhaltige Entwicklung - Die gesellschaftliche Dimension (sustainable development - the social dimension). Discussion paper for the third KMK-BMZ-conference for education in schools. 14.-15.12.2004, Bonn, 2004
- Rauch, 2015, Sustainability in manufacturing through distributed manufacturing systems (DMS), Procedia CIRP, 29, 544, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.069 · DOI
- Markman, 2016, Entrepreneurship as a platform for pursuing multiple goals: A special issue on sustainability, ethics, and entrepreneurship, Journal of Management Studies, 53, 673, 10.1111/joms.12214 · DOI
- Garcia-Muiña, 2018, The Paradigms of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy as Enabling Drivers for the Competitiveness of Businesses and Territories: The Case of an Italian Ceramic Tiles Manufacturing Company, Social Sciences, 7, 255, 10.3390/socsci7120255 · DOI
- Wolf, 2016, Balance or synergies between environment and economy—A note on model structures, Sustainability, 8, 761, 10.3390/su8080761 · DOI
- Brown CA. Axiomatic design for understanding manufacturing engineering as a science. In Proceedings of the 21st CIRP Design Conference, 2011.
- Orzes G, Rauch E, Bednar S, Poklemba R. Industry 4.0 Implementation Barriers in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Focus Group Study. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2018, pp. 1348-1352. IEEE. · DOI
- Schumacher, 2019, Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises, Procedia CIRP, 79, 409, 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110 · DOI · Paper page
- Ganzarain, 2016, Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9, 1119, 10.3926/jiem.2073 · DOI
- Matt DT, Rauch E, Riedl M. Knowledge Transfer and Introduction of Industry 4.0 in SMEs: A Five-Step Methodology to Introduce Industry 4.0. In: Brunet-Thornton R, Martinez F, editors. Analyzing the Impacts of Industry 4.0 in Modern Business Environments, IGI Global: Hershey, PA; 2018. p. 256-282 · DOI
- Paravizo, 2018, Exploring gamification to support manufacturing education on industry 4.0 as an enabler for innovation and sustainability, Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 438, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.142 · DOI
- Garbie, 2017, Incorporating sustainability/sustainable development concepts in teaching industrial systems design courses, Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 417, 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.053 · DOI
- Mourtzis, 2018, Cyber-physical systems and education 4.0-the teaching factory 4.0 concept, Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 129, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005 · DOI
- Stachová, 2019, External partnerships in employee education and development as the key to facing industry 4.0 challenges, Sustainability, 11, 345, 10.3390/su11020345 · DOI
- Chaim, 2018, Insertion of sustainability performance indicators in an industry 4.0 virtual learning environment, Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 446, 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.143 · DOI
- Tseng TLB. Enhancement of Sustainable Manufacturing Engineering Education for Smart Generation through Workshop and Seminars. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings; 2016.
- Huba M, Kozák Š. From E-learning to Industry 4.0. In 2016 International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), pp. 103-108, 2016, IEEE. · DOI
- Brown CA.Axiomatic Design for Products, Processes and Systems. In Matt DT, Modrak V, Zsifkovits H, editors. Industry 4.0 for SMEs Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, to be published in 2019, ISBN 978-3-030-25425-4. · DOI
- Vickery A, Rauch E, Brown CA. Deriving Functional Requirements for Industry 4.0 from Industry’s Assessment of Needs. In Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0: Proceedings of the 25th ISPE Inc. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, July 3-6, 2018 (Vol. 7, p. 23). IOS Press. · DOI
- Lamancusa JS, Jorgensen JE, Zayas-Castro JL, De Ramirez LM. The Learning Factory-Integrating Design, Manufacturing and Business Realities into Engineering Curricula-a Sixth Year Report Card. International Conference on Engineering Education, 2001, pp. 6-10
- Rauch, 2019, AD Design Guidelines for Implementing I4. 0 Learning Factories, Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 239, 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.038 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Latifannisa, N., Wardi, Y., & Marwan (2025) · BASKARA: Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.54268/baskara.v7i2.26926 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rauch, E., & Brown, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rauch, Erwin
- ORCID
- Rauch, Erwin
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 96
- Pages
- 169-174
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3126355231
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- axiomatic design, Industry 4.0, small and medium-sized enterprises, engineering education, sustainable design, ethical design, learning factory, manufacturing systems, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review