Advanced Sustainability Action Plan: Supporting manufacturing SMEs on a sustainability pathway
Open accessAbstract
The manufacturing industry faces numerous challenges: increasing energy and material costs, limited resources availability, customers’ and legal requirements on product quality, climate action, social standards. An example for a political and regulative push is the European Green Deal and the Industry 5.0 strategy announced by the European Commission, which requires manufacturing enterprises to take actions to improve sustainability. Especially small and medium enterprises (SMEs) require support to identify potentially suitable actions to implement. This paper proposes a guided decision support method for SMEs to help them on the sustainability pathway. With a multi-step procedure, the current status of a specific company regarding sustainability actions, their development goals, challenging fields of action, plans and interests in application of advanced technologies and social or environmental services can be identified. Starting from a questionnaire-based self-assessment, relevant fields of actions are derived and potential advanced technologies, social innovations and environmental services are identified. The developed approach combines evaluation of the assessment results, as well as online workshops with SMEs to refine the obtained information, align the suggested set of actions with needs of the companies and prioritize them. As result of this procedure, participating SMEs receive an advanced sustainability action plan (ASAP), which helps them to prioritize available…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social innovation is one of the important aspects of the transformation of corporate sustainability.
“Social innovation innovation is one of the important aspects of the transformation of corporate sustainability.”
From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Kononova et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A New Direction in Human Resources Management and ESG: Transforming Business Models
Sklavos, G., Theodossiou, G., Papanikolaou, Z., Karelakis, C., & Lazarides, T. (2024) · Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5981-5.ch014 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Latifannisa, N., Wardi, Y., & Marwan (2025) · BASKARA: Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.54268/baskara.v7i2.26926
- Authors
- Kononova, N., Juraschek, M., Kohlgrüber, M., & Herrmann, C.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
- TU Dortmund University (DE)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Surface Engineering and Thin Films (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kononova, Nelli
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 354-359
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396711236
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia CIRP (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- TU Braunschweig
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- sustainability action plan, manufacturing SMEs, decision support methodology, self-assessment, high technology, social innovation, ecosystem services, Industry 5.0, European Green Deal, action prioritization, production process efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review