Cited by 23Water Quality Monitoring TechnologiesAlgal biology and biofuel productionInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

A Monitoring, Modeling and Decision Support System (DSS) for a Microalgae Production Plant based on Internet of Things Structure

Open access
Esposito, Serena, Cafiero, Antonio, Giannino, Francesco, Mazzoleni, Stefano, Diano, Marcello Maria·2017·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

Microalgae cultivation is an emerging and interesting field with an increasing market and with Great prospects for the future both in the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and energetic field as well as for other new applications. Microalgae are photosynthetic aquatic microorganism which growth is regulated in-primis by light, temperature, pH and nutrients availability. The monitoring and control of these parameters is crucial in Microalgae cultivation plants because it allows to increase the production and the quality of microalgae biomass feedstock and to prevent the critical conditions for the culture which can compromise the cultivation. In the present work, we present an affordable and easy to use application of Internet of Things (IoT) for the monitoring and control of a microalgae cultivation coupled with a biological modeling for Decision Support System (DSS) to the operator for managing a plant sited in Southern Italy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.316

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of prediction models that allow in-/online monitoring of substrates and products is fundamental for process control, enabling the possibility to take decisions and actions in real-time.

    “Therefore, the development of prediction models that allow in‐/online monitoring of substrates and products is fundamental for process control, enabling the possibility to take decisions and actions in real‐time (Esposito et al., 2017).”

    From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Esposito et al., 2017

    The Introduction describes real-time monitoring of biomass concentration and growth parameters, while §§2.2–2.3 describe predictive simulations that help the operator choose control actions. But §2.1 lists sensors for temperature, irradiance, pH and biomass—not substrates—and the Additional information section says the DSS does not yet support decisions about nutrient supply. The claim's substrate-monitoring component is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Mairet F, Bernard O, Masci P, Lacour T, Sciandra A. Modelling neutral lipid production by the microalga Isochrysis galbana under nitrogen limitation. Bioresource Technology 2011: 102(1):142-149.
  2. Esposito S, Botte V, Iudicone D, d'Alcala MR. Numerical analysis of cumulative impact of phytoplankton photoresponses to light variation on carbon assimilation. Journal of Theorethical Biology 2009: 261(3): 361-371.
  3. Vincenot CE, Giannino F, Rietkerk M, Moriya K, Mazzoleni S. Theoretical considerations on the combined use of System Dynamics and individual-based modeling in ecology. Ecological Modelling 2011: 222(1): 210-218
  4. Vincenot CE., Carteni F, Mazzoleni S, Rietkerk M, Giannino F. Spatial Self-Organization of Vegetation Subject to Climatic Stress-Insights from a System Dynamics-Individual-Based Hybrid Model. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016 7: 1664-462, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00636 · DOI
  5. Vincenot, CE., Cartenì F., Bonanomi G., Mazzoleni S. and Giannino F. Plant-soil negative feedback explains vegetation dynamics and patterns at multiple scales. Oikos 2017. doi:10.1111/oik.04149 · DOI
  6. Mazzoleni S, Landi C, Cartenì F, de Alteriis E, Giannino F, Paciello L, Parascandola P. A novel process-based model of microbial growth: self-inhibition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae aerobic fed-batch cultures. Microbial Cell Factories 2015: 14(1): 109
  7. Mazzoleni S, Cartenì F, Bonanomi G, Senatore M, Termolino P, Giannino F, Incerti G, Rietkerk M, Lanzotti V, Chiusano ML . Inhibitory effects of extracellular self-DNA: a general biological process?. New Phytologist 2015: 206(1): 127-132
  8. Cartenì F., Bonanomi G., Giannino F., Incerti G., Vincenot CE., Chiusano ML., Mazzoleni, S. (2016). Self-DNA inhibitory effects: Underlying mechanisms and ecological implications. Plant Signaling & Behavior 2016: 11(4): e1158381.
  9. Mazzoleni S., Bonanomi G., Giannino F., Incerti G., Dekker SC, Rietkerk M. Modelling the effects of litter decomposition on tree diversity patterns. Ecological modelling 2010: 221(23), 2784-2792
  10. Cartenì F., Marasco A., Bonanomi G., Mazzoleni S., Rietkerk M., Giannino F. Negative plant soil feedback explaining ring formation in clonal plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2012: 313: 153-161.
  11. Marasco A., Iuorio A., Cartení F., Bonanomi G., Tartakovsky DM., Mazzoleni S., Giannino F. Vegetation pattern formation due to interactions between water availability and toxicity in plant-soil feedback. Bulletin of mathematical biology 2014: 76(11): 2866-2883.
  12. Cartenì F., Giannino F., Schweingruber FH., Mazzoleni S. Modelling the development and arrangement of the primary vascular structure in plants. Annals of botany 2014: 114(4): 619-627.
  13. Cuomo S, Michele PD, Piccialli F, Galletti A, Jung JE IoT-based collaborative reputation system for associating visitors and artworks in a cultural scenario. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 79:101-111
  14. Cuomo S, De Michele P, Galletti A, Piccialli F A Cultural Heritage Case Study of Visitor Experiences Shared on a Social Network. 2015 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing, 3PGCIC 2015 7424624, 539-544

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esposito, S., Cafiero, A., Giannino, F., Mazzoleni, S., & Diano, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Cafiero, Antonio
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
113
Pages
519-524
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754308533
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, Internet of Things, decision support system, process monitoring and control, mathematical biology, nutrient availability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review