The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of Diabetes using Classification Algorithms
Open accessAbstract
Diabetes is considered as one of the deadliest and chronic diseases which causes an increase in blood sugar. Many complications occur if diabetes remains untreated and unidentified. The tedious identifying process results in visiting of a patient to a diagnostic center and consulting doctor. But the rise in machine learning approaches solves this critical problem. The motive of this study is to design a model which can prognosticate the likelihood of diabetes in patients with maximum accuracy. Therefore three machine learning classification algorithms namely Decision Tree, SVM and Naive Bayes are used in this experiment to detect diabetes at an early stage. Experiments are performed on Pima Indians Diabetes Database (PIDD) which is sourced from UCI machine learning repository. The performances of all the three algorithms are evaluated on various measures like Precision, Accuracy, F-Measure, and Recall. Accuracy is measured over correctly and incorrectly classified instances. Results obtained show Naive Bayes outperforms with the highest accuracy of 76.30% comparatively other algorithms. These results are verified using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves in a proper and systematic manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction
Uddin, S., Khan, A., Hossain, M. E., & Moni, M. A. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8 · Cited by 1,627
Classification and prediction of diabetes disease using machine learning paradigm
Maniruzzaman, M., Rahman, M. J., Ahammed, B., & Abedin, M. M. (2020) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1007/s13755-019-0095-z · Cited by 369
Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes using Machine Learning Classification Methods
Tigga, N. P., & Garg, S. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.336 · Cited by 361
Gupta, H., Varshney, H., Sharma, T. K., Pachauri, N., & Verma, O. P. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00398-7 · Cited by 191
Hasan, R., Dattana, V., Mahmood, S., & Hussain, S. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16010007 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Sisodia, D., & Sisodia, D. S.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 1578-1585
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807027008
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Diabetes using Classification Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.122
- The paper
- Sisodia, D., & Sisodia, D. S. (2018). Prediction of Diabetes using Classification Algorithms. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.