The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Analysis Of Convolutional Neural Networks For Image Classification
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents an empirical analysis of theperformance of popular convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for identifying objects in real time video feeds. The most popular convolution neural networks for object detection and object category classification from images are Alex Nets, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50. A variety of image data sets are available to test the performance of different types of CNN’s. The commonly found benchmark datasets for evaluating the performance of a convolutional neural network are anImageNet dataset, and CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and MNIST image data sets. This study focuses on analyzing the performance of three popular networks: Alex Net, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50. We have taken three most popular data sets ImageNet, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 for our study, since, testing the performance of a network on a single data set does not reveal its true capability and limitations. It must be noted that videos are not used as a training dataset, they are used as testing datasets. Our analysis shows that GoogLeNet and ResNet50 are able to recognize objects with better precision compared to Alex Net. Moreover, theperformance of trained CNN’s vary substantially across different categories of objects and we, therefore, will discuss the possible reasons for this.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354
(2011) · doi:10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-210 · Cited by 1,229
Cited by
Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey
Krichen, M. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12080151 · Cited by 623
A Comparison of Pooling Methods for Convolutional Neural Networks
Zafar, A., Aamir, M., Mohd Nawi, N., Arshad, A., Riaz, S., Alruban, A., Dutta, A. K., & Almotairi, S. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12178643 · Cited by 367
Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks
Pesah, A., Cerezo, M., Wang, S., Volkoff, T., Sornborger, A. T., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041011 · Cited by 343
Automatic License Plate Recognition via sliding-window darknet-YOLO deep learning
Hendry, & Chen, R.-C. (2019) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2019.04.007 · Cited by 304
Koskinopoulou, M., Raptopoulos, F., Papadopoulos, G., Mavrakis, N., & Maniadakis, M. (2021) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2021.3066040 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, N., Jain, V., & Mishra, A.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 377-384
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807436399
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Analysis Of Convolutional Neural Networks For Image Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.198
- The paper
- Sharma, N., Jain, V., & Mishra, A. (2018). An Analysis Of Convolutional Neural Networks For Image Classification. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.