The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Advancement in Intrusion Detection Datasets
Open accessAbstract
The research in the field of Cyber Security has raised the need to address the issue of cybercrimes that have caused the requisition of the intellectual properties such as break down of computer systems, impairment of important data, compromising the confidentiality, authenticity, and integrity of the user. Considering these scenarios, it is essential to secure the computer systems and the user using an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). The performance of IDS studied by developing an IDS dataset, consisting of network traffic features to learn the attack patterns. Intrusion detection is a classification problem, wherein various Machine Learning (ML) and Data Mining (DM) techniques applied to classify the network data into normal and attack traffic. Moreover, the types of network attacks changed over the years, and therefore, there is a need to update the datasets used for evaluating IDS. This paper list the different IDS datasets used for the evaluation of IDS model. The paper presents an overview of the ML and DM techniques used for IDS along with the discussion on CIC-IDS-2017 and CSE-CIC-IDS-2018. These are recent datasets consisting of network attack features and include new attacks categories. This paper discusses the recent advancement in the IDS datasets that can be used by various research communities as the manifesto for using the new IDS datasets for developing efficient and effective ML and DM based IDS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Toward Credible Evaluation of Anomaly-Based Intrusion-Detection Methods
Tavallaee, M., Stakhanova, N., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2048428 · Cited by 280
Cited by
One-Class Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications: A Comparative Survey and Experimental Study
Paolini, D., Dini, P., Soldaini, E., & Saponara, S. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14070281 · Cited by 21
Shafi, M., Lashkari, A. H., & Roudsari, A. H. (2025) · Journal of Network and Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s10922-025-09917-0 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Thakkar, A., & Lohiya, R.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 636-645
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016974523
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Advancement in Intrusion Detection Datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.330
- The paper
- Thakkar, A., & Lohiya, R. (2020). A Review of the Advancement in Intrusion Detection Datasets. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.