The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benefits Realisation in Post-Implementation Development of ERP Systems: A Case Study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“reviews of previous studies by Hietala and Päivärinta (2021), Harun and Mansor (2019), Ghosh et al. (2013), and Cao et al. (2013) suggested that the existing ERP literature is skewed towards the selection and implementation phases and not the post-implementation phases of the ERP research.”
From ERP Post-Implementation Phase: Deployment of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model on User Acceptance (2023) · cites this paper as Hietala and Päivärinta (2021)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ERP system implementation in large enterprises—A systematic literature review
Ali, M., & Miller, L. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2014-0071 · Cited by 221
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Klaus, 2000, ”What is ERP?.”, Information Systems Frontiers, 2, 141, 10.1023/A:1026543906354 · DOI · Paper page
- Sumner, M. (2018) “ERP Project Retrospectives—55 Enterprise Systems: Evaluating Project Success, Lessons Learned, and Business Outcomes.” In: Proceedings of Midwest Association for Information Systems: 1-10.
- Johansson, 2016, “After a Successful Business Case of ERP - What Happens Then?.”, Procedia Computer Science, 100, 383, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.173 · DOI
- Oseni, 2017, “A Framework for ERP Post-Implementation Amendments: A Literature Analysis.”, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1, 10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1268 · DOI
- Haddara, M. & Päivärinta, T. (2011) “Why Benefits Realization from ERP in SMEs doesn’t Seem to Matter?.” In: Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 1-10. · DOI
- Peppard, 2007, “Managing the Realization of Business Benefits from IT Investments.”, MIS Quarterly Executive, 6, 1
- Hesselmann, F & Mohan, K. (2014) “Where are we headed with benefits management research? Current Shortcomings and Avenues for Future Research.” In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems: 1-17.
- Osnes, 2018, “ERP Systems in Multinational Enterprises: A literature Review of Post-implementation Challenges.”, Procedia Computer Science, 138, 541, 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.074 · DOI
- Esteves, J. M. & Pastor, J. A. (1999) “An ERP Life-cycle-based Research Agenda.” Proceedings of 1st International Workshop of Enterprise Management and Resource Planning: Methods, Tools and Architectures.
- Coombs, 2015, “When Planned IS/IT Project Benefits are not Realized: A Study of Inhibitors and Facilitators to Benefits Realization.”, International Journal of Project Management, 33, 363, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.012 · DOI
- Ward, 1996, “Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice.”, European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 214, 10.1057/ejis.1996.3 · DOI
- Ashurst, 2008, “Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model.”, European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 352, 10.1057/ejis.2008.33 · DOI
- Einhorn, 2019, “Achieving strategic benefits from business IT projects: The critical importance of using the business case across the entire project lifetime.”, International Journal of Project Management, 37, 989, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.001 · DOI
- Ward, 2008, “Building Better Business Cases for IT Investments.”, MIS Quarterly Executive, 7, 1
- Badewi, 2018, “ERP benefits capability framework: orchestration theory perspective.”, Business Process Management Journal, 24, 266, 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0162 · DOI
- Zwikael, 2018, “Project benefit management: Setting effective target benefits.”, International Journal of Project Management, 36, 650, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.002 · DOI
- Badewi, 2016, “The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: Neo-institutional theory perspective.”, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 412, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.002 · DOI
- Kallunki, 2011, “Impact of enterprise resource planning systems on management control systems and firm performance.”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12, 20, 10.1016/j.accinf.2010.02.001 · DOI
- Shanks, G., Parr, A., Hu, B., Corbitt, B., Thanasankit, T. & Seddon, P. (2000) “Differences in Critical Success Factors in ERP Systems Implementation in Australia and China: A Cultural Analysis.” In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems: 537-544.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mohamad Zain, M. R., Tajul Urus, S., Trinh, T., Amirul, S. M., & Tuan Mat, T. Z. (2023) · Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal · doi:10.24191/apmaj.v18i1-05 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hietala, H., & Päivärinta, T.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 181
- Pages
- 419-426
- ISSN
- 1877-0509
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits Realisation in Post-Implementation Development of ERP Systems: A Case Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.186
- The paper
- Hietala, H., & Päivärinta, T. (2021). Benefits Realisation in Post-Implementation Development of ERP Systems: A Case Study. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.186
