Cited by 11Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Emotional Dependence Path of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Based on Structural Equation Modeling

Open access
Wang, Yujie·2024·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

With the rise of ChatGPT, the anthropomorphic dialogue form of chatbots is sought after and relied on by a large number of users. Compared with traditional social real objects, chatbots are more controllable in social relationships. At the same time, compared with traditional real social objects, chatbots may show better emotional identification with objects. The structural equation modeling is a path analysis method based on the factor analysis and linear regression, which can be used to analyze the path relationship between intricate variables. Based on the structural equation modeling, this paper analyzes the potential pathways for artificial intelligence chatbots to induce the user's emotional dependence. The results show that the “sense of identification” and “sense of control” will cause people to have emotional dependence on the artificial intelligence chatbots, with p < 0.05. However, the psychological distance plays a regulating role in the identification-emotional dependence and the sense of control-emotional dependence, respectively. The research results in this paper show that there is a certain theoretical basis for the chatting intelligent robots to transform from a tool role to a social and emotional role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2024.10.131

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sense of identification with the chatbot predicts emotional LLM-CB dependence.

    “Wang identified individual-difference predictors of emotional LLM-CB dependence, specifically individuals’ sense of identification with the chatbot, sense of control, and a lack of psychological distancing118.”
  • Sense of control predicts emotional LLM-CB dependence.

    “Wang identified individual-difference predictors of emotional LLM-CB dependence, specifically individuals’ sense of identification with the chatbot, sense of control, and a lack of psychological distancing118.”
  • Lack of psychological distancing predicts emotional LLM-CB dependence.

    “Wang identified individual-difference predictors of emotional LLM-CB dependence, specifically individuals’ sense of identification with the chatbot, sense of control, and a lack of psychological distancing118.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y.
Affiliations
Communication University of Zhejiang (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yujie
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024
Volume
247
Pages
1089-1094
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404410017
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3
FWCI
7.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
emotional dependence, AI chatbots, anthropomorphism, perceived control, psychological distance, ChatGPT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review