The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Trends and Future Directions for Sexual Health Conversational Agents (CAs) for Youth: A Scoping Review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Park et al. (2024) found that in two of the eight included studies, young people found the information offered by sexual health conversational agents limited and not inclusive of sexual and gender minorities.
“in two of the eight included studies, young people found the information offered limited and not inclusive of sexual and gender minorities.”
From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Park et al. (2024)
The studies conducted in Japan, Brazil, Kenya, and Thailand offer valuable glimpses of what LGBTQ+ youth digital health research can look like in non-Western contexts, but they remain the exception rather than the rule.
“The studies conducted in Japan (Hasei et al., 2025), Brazil (Park et al., 2024), Kenya (Massa et al., 2023), and Thailand (Samoh et al., 2026) offer valuable glimpses of what LGBTQ+ youth digital health research can look like in non-Western contexts, but they remain the exception rather than the rule.”
From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic Review: Trust-Building Factors and Implications for Conversational Agent Design
Rheu, M., Shin, J. Y., Peng, W., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2021) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710 · Cited by 360
Crutzen, R., Peters, G.-J. Y., Portugal, S. D., Fisser, E. M., & Grolleman, J. J. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.002 · Cited by 205
Massa, P., de Souza Ferraz, D. A., Magno, L., Silva, A. P., Greco, M., Dourado, I., & Grangeiro, A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/41881 · Cited by 42
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Lorainne, 2020, Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis, Journal of medical Internet research, 22, e17158, 10.2196/17158 · DOI · Paper page
- Tom, 2021, Barriers and facilitators to engagement with artificial intelligence (ai)-based chatbots for sexual and reproductive health advice: a qualitative analysis, Sexual health, 18, 385, 10.1071/SH21123 · DOI
- Divyaa, 2022, Effectiveness and acceptability of conversational agents for sexual health promotion: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Sexual health, 19, 391, 10.1071/SH22016 · DOI
- Rhiana, 2023, Chatbots to improve sexual and reproductive health: realist synthesis, Journal of medical Internet research, 25, e46761, 10.2196/46761 · DOI
- David, 2010, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement, International journal of surgery, 8, 336, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Gareth, Terry, Nikki, Hayfield, Victoria, Clarke, and Virginia, Braun. (2017) “Thematic analysis”, in Carla Willing and Wendy Stainton Rogers (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, Sage · DOI · Paper page
- Hua, 2022, An artificial intelligence chatbot for young people's sexual and reproductive health in india (snehai): instrumental case study, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24, e29969, 10.2196/29969 · DOI · Paper page
- Erika, 2021, Layla's got you: developing a tailored contraception chatbot for black and hispanic young women, Health Education Journal, 80, 413, 10.1177/0017896920981122 · DOI
- Liew, 2023, Let's talk about sex!: Ai and relational factors in the adoption of a chatbot conveying sexual and reproductive health information, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11, 10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100323 · DOI · Paper page
- Julius, 2023, Assessing acceptability and effectiveness of a pleasure-oriented sexual and reproductive health chatbot in kenya: an exploratory mixed-methods study, Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31
- Lai, 2023, Supporting the demand on mental health services with ai-based conversational large language models (llms), BioMedInformatics, 4, 8, 10.3390/biomedinformatics4010002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review
Shekarchi, R., Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., Calaresi, D., Giordano, F., & Prunas, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.2002054
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J. K., Singh, V., & Wisniewski, P.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 251
- Pages
- 318-325
- ISSN
- 1877-0509
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
