The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review on fruit harvesting method for potential use of automatic fruit harvesting systems
Open accessAbstract
In horticultural industry, conventional harvesting is done by ‘handpicking’ methods to remove hundreds of fruits such as citrus fruits in random spatial locations on the individual fruit trees. It is well known that harvesting fruits in a large scale is still inefficient and not cost effective. To solve this challenging task, mechanical harvesting systems have been investigated and practiced to enhance profitability and efficiency of horticultural businesses. However they often damage fruits in the harvesting process. Development of efficient fruit removal methods are required to maintain the fruits quality. This paper reviews fruit harvesting systems from purely mechanical based systems in which operator involvement is still required, to automatic robotic harvesting systems which require minimal or no human intervention in their operation. The researches on machine vision system methodologies used in the automatic detection, inspection and the location of fruits for harvesting are also included. The review is focused on the citrus fruits due to the fact that the research on citrus fruit harvesting mechanism is a bit more advanced than others. Major issues are addressed in the camera sensor and filter designs and image segmentation methods used to identify the fruits within the image. From this review, the major research issues are addressed as future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sensors and systems for fruit detection and localization: A review
Gongal, A., Amatya, S., Karkee, M., Zhang, Q., & Lewis, K. (2015) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.05.021 · Cited by 572
Zhang, B., Xie, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, K., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105694 · Cited by 484
Automation in Agriculture by Machine and Deep Learning Techniques: A Review of Recent Developments
Saleem, M. H., Potgieter, J., & Arif, K. M. (2021) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-021-09806-x · Cited by 434
Design, integration, and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester
Silwal, A., Davidson, J. R., Karkee, M., Mo, C., Zhang, Q., & Lewis, K. (2017) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21715 · Cited by 406
Intelligent robots for fruit harvesting: recent developments and future challenges
Zhou, H., Wang, X., Au, W., Kang, H., & Chen, C. (2022) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-022-09913-3 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, P., Lee, S.-H., & Hsu, H.-Y.
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 351-366
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047412445
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review on fruit harvesting method for potential use of automatic fruit harvesting systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2514
- The paper
- Li, P., Lee, S.-H., & Hsu, H.-Y. (2011). Review on fruit harvesting method for potential use of automatic fruit harvesting systems. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.