Cited by 402Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceMaterials Engineering and Processing

Toward green concrete for better sustainable environment

Open access
Suhendro, Bambang·2014·Procedia Engineering

Abstract

Eight to 10 percent of the world's total CO2 emissions come from manufacturing cement. The global warming gas is released when limestone and clays are crushed and heated to high temperatures. Green concrete is defined as a concrete which uses waste material as at least one of its components, or its production process does not lead to environmental destruction, or it has high performance and life cycle sustainability. Various efforts have been conducted by researchers to arrive at some alternatives that are able to significantly reduce high energy consumed and environmental impacts during fabrication process of cement, including implementing the concept of industrial ecology and green chemistry as well as nanoengineering that study the behavior of the structure and organization of nanoparticles of cement in the mix for achieving higher performance. The cleaner technologies in concrete production, such as substituting relatively high percentage of cement by fly ash (up to 100%), the use of other natural pozzolans, development of concrete with recycling or waste materials, and developing nanoconcrete by integrating CNT's or self sensing CNT's in the concrete mix for higher performance in terms of strength, stiffness, and durability, have been developed and are addressed in this paper. Several efforts that have been done so far in implementing the concept of green concrete and material development of nanosilica in Indonesia is discussed. Finally, problems in the realization of and potential barriers to green concrete as well as political scenarios that have been adopted by several countries through implementation of various priorities and deregulation in various fields are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.190

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of lime and cement produces carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and other dust that affects air quality and has a deleterious environmental impact; carbon dioxide accounts for 8-10% of global emissions.

    “The use of lime and cement produces carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and other dust that affects air quality and that have a deleterious impact on the environment.Of these emissions, carbon dioxide accounts for 8-10% of global emissions [10][11][12].”

    From Expansive Soil Stabilization Using Alkali-Activated Fly Ash (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 1.1 and the Conclusions state that cement manufacturing accounts for 8–10% of worldwide CO₂ emissions and describe its environmental impact. The barriers-to-green-concrete table mentions SO₂, but the passages do not say that using lime and cement produces SO₂ or dust that affects air quality. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Struble, L. and Godfrey, J. (2006). "How Sustainable is Concrete ?". International Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 201-211.
  2. Mehta, P. K. (2010). "Sustainable Cements and Concrete for the Climate Change Era -A Review". Proc. 2 nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies. Ancona, Italy, June 28-30.
  3. Obla, K.H. (2009). "What is Green Concrete ?". The Indian Concrete Journal, April, 26-28.
  4. Constantinides, G., and Ulm, F.-J. (2007). "The nanogranular nature of C-S-H." Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 55 (1), 64--90.
  5. Ulm, F.J. (2007). "MIT's Technology Review".
  6. Pham, G.T., Park, Y.B., Liang, Z. and Zhang, C. (2008). "Processing and modeling of conductive thermoplastic/carbon nanotube films for strain sensing". Composites Part B : Engineering, Elsevier, 39 (1), January, 209-216.
  7. Li, C., Thostenson, E. T. and Chou, T.W. (2008). "Sensors and actuators based on carbon nanotubes and their composites: A review". Composite Science and Technology , 68, 1227-1249.
  8. Ghasemzadeh, H. & Jalalabad, E.A. 2011. "Comput-ing the compressive strength of carbon nanotube/ cement composite". International Journal of Civil Engineering -Structural Engineering, 9 (3), September.
  9. Nielsen, C.V. & Glavind, M. (2007). "Danish Experiences with a Decade of Green Concrete". Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology . Japan Concrete Institute , 5(1), February, 3-12.
  10. Bilodeau, A. & Malhotra, V.M. (2000). "High Volume Fly Ash System: Concrete Solution for Sustainable Development". Materials Journal, Vol. 97, January, 41-48.
  11. Nielsen, C.V. (2002). "Mechanical Properties for Green Concrete". Featured at the XVIII Symposium on Nordic Concrete Research, Helsingør, June, Denmark.
  12. Manmohan, D. & Mehta, K. (2002). "Heavily Reinforced Shearwalls and Mass Foundation Built with Green Concrete". Concrete International. Vol. 24, No. 8, August, 64-70.
  13. Uzal, B., Turanli, L. and Mehta, P.K. (2007). "High-Volume Natural Pozzolan Concrete for Structural Applications". Materials Journal. 104 (5), September, 535-538.
  14. Berry, M., Cross, D. & Stephens, J. (2009). "Changing the Environment : An Alternative Green Concrete Produced without Portland Cement". Orld of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference -May 4-7, Lexington, KY, USA.
  15. Glavind, M. & Jepsen, M.T. (2002). "Evaluation of Green Concrete Types". Proceedings of the XVIII Symposium on Nordic Concrete Research. Helsinger, June.
  16. Horiguchi, T. & Saeki, N. (2004). "Compressive Strength and Leachate Characteristics of New Green CLSM with Eco- Cement and Melted Slag from Municipal Solid Waste". Special Publication, Vol. 221, May.
  17. Horiguchi, T., Kikuchi, T., Nakagawa, Y. & Shimura, K. (2007). "Physical Properties of CLSM Using High Volumes of Incineration Ash from Sewage Sludge". Special Publication, Vol. 242, April.
  18. Damtoft, J.S., Glavind, M. & Munch-Petersen, C. (2001). "Danish Centre for Green Concrete". Proceedings of CANMET / ACI International Conference. San Fransisco, September.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suhendro, B.
Affiliations
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Corresponding author
Suhendro, Bambang
Venue
Procedia Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
Volume
95
Pages
305-320
ISSN
1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037010817
Cited by
402
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
24.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
sustainable concrete, fly ash, natural pozzolan, waste materials in concrete, recycled aggregate concrete, carbon nanotubes, self-sensing concrete, silica nanoparticles, industrial ecology, green chemistry, nanoengineering, concrete durability, sustainable construction materials, environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review