The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction?
Open accessAbstract
The paper presents the state-of-the-art concerning the current achievements in the field of 3D printing of buildings and building components. The 3D printing technologies, comparing to traditional techniques of constructing the buildings, could be considered as environmental friendly derivative giving almost unlimited possibilities for geometric complexity realizations. Two kinds of technologies were described in this paper with pointing to Contour Crafting as a promising technique that may be able to revolutionize construction industry in near future. Numerous advantages of this technology, such as reduction of the costs and time, minimizing the pollution of environment and decrease of injuries and fatalities on construction sites could be cited. Despite many advantages and hopes, some concerns are summarized in the conclusions, as the technology still has many limitations. A brief description of few examples of pioneering usage of 3D printing in construction industry are presented (Canal House in Amsterdam, WinSun company and printing application for building carried out by Skanska company). Creating a model that will be appropriate for 3D printers is possible in many different modelling programs. One of the most popular formats for sharing such models is STL format. In the paper sample models crated in Autodesk Inventor are shown, but also other tools suitable for preparing models for 3D printing are briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies
Khoshnevis, B. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 · Cited by 1,161
Sulfur ‘concrete’ for lunar applications–Sublimation concerns
Grugel, R. N., & Toutanji, H. (2008) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.08.018 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications
Shahrubudin, N., Lee, T. C., & Ramlan, R. (2019) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 · Cited by 2,050
Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review
Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. M. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8010045 · Cited by 543
Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kadirgama, K., Harun, W. S. W., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 · Cited by 426
Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review
Mohan, M. K., Rahul, A. V., De Schutter, G., & Van Tittelboom, K. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103855 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Hager, I., Golonka, A., & Putanowicz, R.
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 292-299
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2482629727
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357
- The paper
- Hager, I., Golonka, A., & Putanowicz, R. (2016). 3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction? Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.