The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of peer-mentoring on stress and anxiety levels of undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review
Abstract
Background Nursing students, whether undergraduate or graduate, are at a higher risk for stress and anxiety due to competitiveness and complexities of nursing school. There is evidence in the literature on the effects of peer mentoring among nursing students. Peer mentoring has been associated with increased retention, student engagement, and skills competence among nursing students. There is, however, paucity in the literature about peer mentoring's effect on stress and anxiety levels of undergraduate nursing students.Purpose To examine the literature on the effect of peer mentoring on stress and anxiety levels among undergraduate nursing students.Theoretical framework Bandura's Self-Efficacy Theory was used to guide this review.Method An integrative review of the literature was conducted. Electronic databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and ERIC using keywords: nurse*, student*, undergrad*, stress and nursing students, anxiety and nursing students, and mentor*. Review was limited to peer reviewed articles published in the English language from January 2000 to August 2018. Articles were independently reviewed by three authors, and the quality of data was evaluated using established criteria.Results Eight articles were included in the review. Review suggested that peer mentoring decreases stress, and situation or short-term anxiety levels of undergraduate nursing students. However, results should be interpreted with caution based on limited studies identified.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Extensive research indicated that SI exerted a significant positive effect on PEOU because endorsement from peers and mentors reduces the cognitive burden and anxiety associated with adopting new technology [68,69].”
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare : a guide to best practice
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2005) · Wolters Kluwer eBooks · Cited by 1,887
Stress and health in novice and experienced nursing students
Jiménez, C. J., Navia‐Osorio, P. M., & Diaz, C. V. (2010) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05183.x · Cited by 367
Stress, Depression, and Anxiety among Undergraduate Nursing Students
Chernomas, W. M., & Shapiro, C. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship · doi:10.1515/ijnes-2012-0032 · Cited by 276
Role stress in nurses: Review of related factors and strategies for moving forward
Chang, E. M. L., Hancock, K. M., Johnson, A., Daly, J. W., & Jackson, D. W. (2005) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00221.x · Cited by 259
Cheung, T., Wong, S., Wong, K., Law, L., Ng, K., Tong, M., Wong, K., Ng, M., & Yip, P. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13080779 · Cited by 212
Reducing Student Anxiety by Using Clinical Peer Mentoring With Beginning Nursing Students
Sprengel, A. D., & Job, L. (2004) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/00006223-200411000-00010 · Cited by 125
Shipton, S. P. (2002) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20020601-05 · Cited by 98
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, Y., Wang, A., Wu, Y., Han, N., & Huang, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669119 · Cited by 441
Quality of Life, Resilience, and Related Factors of Nursing Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Keener, T. A., Hall, K. M., Wang, K., Hulsey, T., & Piamjariyakul, U. (2021) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000969 · Cited by 91
Jeggo, M. H., Wardley, R. C., & Brownlie, J. (1984) · PubMed Central · Cited by 67
Malta, G. D., Bond, J., Conroy, D., Smith, K., & Moller, N. P. (2022) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2022.2029352 · Cited by 83
“For example, peer mentoring schemes were found to improve student wellbeing (Akinla et al., 2018; Collings et al., 2014) and reduce stress and anxiety (Kachaturoff et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPeer mentoring programs for nursing students: A mixed methods systematic review
Lim, S., Lim, X. M., Chan, C. J. W., Dong, Y., Mikkonen, K., & Zhou, W. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105577 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Kachaturoff, M., Caboral-Stevens, M., Gee, M., & Lan, V. M.
- Affiliations
- Eastern Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Caboral-Stevens, Meriam
- Venue
- Journal of Professional Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 223-228
- ISSN
- 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-7223
- OpenAlex
- W2994815493
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- peer mentoring, nursing students, undergraduate nursing education, stress, anxiety, self-efficacy, student retention, student engagement
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Anxiety, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Mentors, Students, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
