Cited by 35Problem and Project Based LearningInnovations in Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Case-based learning interventions for undergraduate nursing students in a theoretical course: a review of design, implementation, and outcomes

Yao, Jiannan, Fu, Rong, Zhu, Mingyue, Jia, Luyao, Dong, Xueqi, Shi, Yu, Zhang, Xiuying, Yuan, Hua·2023·Journal of Professional Nursing

Abstract

Background Case-based learning (CBL) is a contextualized learning and teaching method that can facilitate active and reflective learning to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, nursing educators have some difficulty in creating a CBL environment that matches the diverse professional nursing curriculum and students' needs, including developing relevant cases and appropriate CBL implementation processes. Objective To summarize the case design, implementation process, and their relationship with CBL effectiveness. Methods Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data (a Chinese database) were searched from inception until January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A qualitative synthesis was then conducted to summarize the study findings. Results The systematic mixed studies review included twenty-one quantitative studies, five qualitative studies and two mixed methods studies. The case design and implementation process were indispensable parts of each study, but the application process of CBL in each study was slightly different, basically including case design, preparation, small-group interaction and exploration, collaborative efforts, teacher summary, assignment and teacher feedback. There were three themes in this review that indicate the effect of CBL on students, namely, knowledge, competence and attitude. Conclusion The present…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.03.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yao, J., Fu, R., Zhu, M., Jia, L., Dong, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, X., & Yuan, H.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Shenyang Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Xiuying
  • Yuan, Hua
Venue
Journal of Professional Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
46
Pages
119-133
ISSN
  • 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-7223
OpenAlex
W4360618122
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jilin University (2020zsjpk58, 2021JGZ02, ALK201946, SK202083)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
case-based learning, nursing education, undergraduate nursing students, test case design, active learning, critical thinking, cooperative learning
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Learning, Students, Nursing, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review