Case-based learning interventions for undergraduate nursing students in a theoretical course: a review of design, implementation, and outcomes
Abstract
Background Case-based learning (CBL) is a contextualized learning and teaching method that can facilitate active and reflective learning to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, nursing educators have some difficulty in creating a CBL environment that matches the diverse professional nursing curriculum and students' needs, including developing relevant cases and appropriate CBL implementation processes. Objective To summarize the case design, implementation process, and their relationship with CBL effectiveness. Methods Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data (a Chinese database) were searched from inception until January 2022. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A qualitative synthesis was then conducted to summarize the study findings. Results The systematic mixed studies review included twenty-one quantitative studies, five qualitative studies and two mixed methods studies. The case design and implementation process were indispensable parts of each study, but the application process of CBL in each study was slightly different, basically including case design, preparation, small-group interaction and exploration, collaborative efforts, teacher summary, assignment and teacher feedback. There were three themes in this review that indicate the effect of CBL on students, namely, knowledge, competence and attitude. Conclusion The present…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Case-based learning enhances the learning experience and equips students with the competencies required for clinical practice.
“Recent studies have confirmed that this model can enhance the learning experience while equipping students with the competencies required for clinical practice (11).”
From The effectiveness of an integrated CBL and BOPPPS model in neurological nursing clinical teaching: a comparative study (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Case-based learning used in isolation may lack an explicit structure for goal-setting, diagnostic pre-assessment, and closed-loop feedback, which can limit the consistency of learning gains.
“Nevertheless, CBL used in isolation may lack an explicit structure for goal-setting, diagnostic pre-assessment, and closed-loop feedback, which can limit the consistency of learning gains (11).”
From The effectiveness of an integrated CBL and BOPPPS model in neurological nursing clinical teaching: a comparative study (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002 · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qian, P., Su, J., & Xu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1789025
- Authors
- Yao, J., Fu, R., Zhu, M., Jia, L., Dong, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, X., & Yuan, H.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University (CN)
- Shenyang Medical College (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Xiuying
- Yuan, Hua
- Venue
- Journal of Professional Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 119-133
- ISSN
- 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-7223
- OpenAlex
- W4360618122
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Jilin University (2020zsjpk58, 2021JGZ02, ALK201946, SK202083)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Keywords
- case-based learning, nursing education, undergraduate nursing students, test case design, active learning, critical thinking, cooperative learning
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Learning, Students, Nursing, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review