The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry 4.0 – A Glimpse
Open accessAbstract
Digitization and intelligentization of manufacturing process is the need for today’s industry. The manufacturing industries are currently changing from mass production to customized production. The rapid advancements in manufacturing technologies and applications in the industries help in increasing productivity. The term Industry 4.0 stands for the fourth industrial revolution which is defined as a new level of organization and control over the entire value chain of the life cycle of products; it is geared towards increasingly individualized customer requirements. Industry 4.0 is still visionary but a realistic concept which includes Internet of Things, Industrial Internet, Smart Manufacturing and Cloud based Manufacturing. Industry 4.0 concerns the strict integration of human in the manufacturing process so as to have continuous improvement and focus on value adding activities and avoiding wastes. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of Industry 4.0 and understanding of the nine pillars of Industry 4.0 with its applications and identifying the challenges and issues occurring with implementation the Industry 4.0 and to study the new trends and streams related to Industry 4.0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As a result of the smart factory concept implementation, Lean, Flexible, Sustainable, Digital, Cloud, Intelligent, Holonic, Additive and Agile manufacturing models have been defined [3], [4], based on utilization of specific groups of I4.0 enabling technologies and their impact on the entire industrial value chain.”
From SCADA Systems With Focus on Continuous Manufacturing and Steel Industry: A Survey on Architectures, Standards, Challenges and Industry 5.0 (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment
Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 · Cited by 1,965
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Stock, T. W., & Seliger, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 · Cited by 1,947
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook
Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1155/2016/3159805 · Cited by 1,527
“Industrie 4.0” and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples
Thoben, K., Wiesner, S., Wuest, T., & Industrial and Management Systems Engineering (2017) · International Journal of Automation Technology · doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004 · Cited by 1,148
A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond
Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R. I. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.005 · Cited by 1,043
INDUSTRY 4.0: A REVIEW ON INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION AND ROBOTIC
Bahrin, M. A. K., Othman, M. F., Azli, N. H. N., & Talib, M. F. (2016) · Jurnal Teknologi · doi:10.11113/jt.v78.9285 · Cited by 680
Tangible Industry 4.0: A Scenario-Based Approach to Learning for the Future of Production
Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162 · Cited by 636
The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)
Almada-Lobo, F. (2016) · Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.24840/2183-0606_003.004_0003 · Cited by 622
Lean Automation enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies
Kolberg, D., & Zühlke, D. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359 · Cited by 617
Cyber-physical Systems Architecture for Self-Aware Machines in Industry 4.0 Environment
Bagheri, B., Yang, S., Kao, H.-A., & Lee, J. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318 · Cited by 361
Collaboration Mechanisms to Increase Productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0
Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A. R., & Prote, J.-P. (2014) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.016 · Cited by 354
Industrie 4.0 - From the Perspective of Applied Research
Neugebauer, R., Hippmann, S., Leis, M., & Landherr, M. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.002 · Cited by 142
Service Provision in the Framework of Industry 4.0
Rennung, F. M., Luminosu, C. T., & Drăghici, A. (2016) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.127 · Cited by 102
Collaborative Maintenance in flow-line Manufacturing Environments: An Industry 4.0 Approach
Σίψας, Κ., Alexopoulos, K., Xanthakis, V., & Chryssolouris, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.013 · Cited by 90
From PSS to CPS Design: A Real Industrial Use Case Toward Industry 4.0
Marilungo, E., Papetti, A., Germani, M., & Peruzzini, M. (2017) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.007 · Cited by 82
Simons, S., Abé, P., & Neser, S. (2017) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.023 · Cited by 78
The Application Center Industrie 4.0 - Industry-driven Manufacturing, Research and Development
Landherr, M., Schneider, U., & Bauernhansl, T. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.006 · Cited by 65
Schedule coordination in cyber-physical supply networks Industry 4.0
Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Іванова, М. (2016) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.879 · Cited by 45
Product-Service Architecture (PSA): toward a Service Engineering perspective in Industry 4.0
Dutra, D. D. S., & Silva, J. R. (2016) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.167 · Cited by 26
Flagged first, then by citations
14 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Brettel, 2014, How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 8, 36
- Witkowski, 2017, Internet of Things, Big Data, Industry 4.0- Innovative Solutions in Logistics and Supply Chains Management, 7th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management, Procedia Engineering, 182, 763
- E. Hozdić, Smart Factory for Industry 4.0: A Review, International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, ISSN 2067–3604, (Vol. VII, No. 1 (2015) 28-35.
- A.C. Valdeza, P. Braunera, A.K. Schaara, Reducing Complexity with Simplicity - Usability Methods for Industry 4.0, Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA, Melbourne 9-14 August 2015.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104035 · Cited by 871
AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications
Rashid, A. B., & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277 · Cited by 764
Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions
Culot, G., Nassimbeni, G., Orzes, G., & Sartor, M. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107617 · Cited by 746
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Dhone, N. C. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S.
- Corresponding author
- Vaidya, Saurabh
- ORCID
- Bhosle, Santosh
- Venue
- Procedia Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 233-238
- ISSN
- 2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791987562
- Cited by
- 1,352
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 233 · 2021: 260 · 2020: 188 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 32
- FWCI
- 116.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Keywords
- Industry 4.0, digitalization of manufacturing, Internet of Things, Industrial Internet of Things, smart manufacturing, cloud manufacturing, value chain integration, waste reduction, implementation barriers, manufacturing trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
