The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lean meets Industrie 4.0 – a practical approach to interlink the method world and cyber-physical world
Open accessAbstract
Lean management and “Industrie 4.0” have often been considered as separate subjects. Lean management, as a methodical approach, aims at realizing a continuous value stream with less waste by means of continuous optimizations and standardization. On the opposite, the digitalization of the production, characterized by “Industrie 4.0”, is not based on methods. It focusses on the technology-driven vision of the combination of the physical world and the cyber world, which can be realized mainly by the application of technologies. The given article demonstrates the necessity of lean management as a requirement for “Industrie 4.0”. It will illustrate the link between both topics and show the maturity levels of the unification of both topics. For that reason, a practical learning factory approach with several levels of maturity is presented, focussing on assistance systems as one part of “Industrie 4.0”, to show the effects of “Industrie 4.0” on lean production workplaces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite, the significant differences, between the two concepts, they seem to have the same goal, to increase added value [50].”
From Lean and Kaizen: The Past and the Future of the Methodologies (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- G. Reinhart (2017), Handbuch Industrie 4.0. Geschäftsmodelle, Prozesse, Technik. München: Hanser. · DOI
- Prinz, 2016, Learning Factory Modules for Smart Factories in Industrie 4.0, In: Procedia CIRP, 54, 113
- Hirsch-Kreinsen, 2014, Wandel von Produktionsarbeit – ‚Industrie 4.0’, In: WSI-Mitteilungen, 6, 421
- Windelband, 2014, Zukunft der Facharbeit im Zeitalter "Industrie 4.0", In: Journal of Technical Education (JOTED), 2, 138
- Ullrich, 2015, Assistenz-und Wissensdienste für den Shopfloor, In: Proceedings der Pre - Conference Workshops der 13. E - Learning Fachtagung Informatik - DeLFI 2015. München, 47
- C. Prinz, D. Jentsch, N. Kreggenfeld, F. Morlock, A. Merkel, E. Müller, D. Kreimeier, C. Prinz, D. Jentsch, N. Kreggenfeld, F. Morlock, A. Merkel, Concept of Semi-Autonomous Production Planning and Decision Support Based on Virtual Technology//Concept of semi-autonomous production planning and decision support based on virtual technology. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Flexible Automation & Intelligent Manufacturing 1049–1057. · DOI
- C. Prinz, D. Kreimeier, B. Kuhlenkötter (2017), Implementation of a Learning Environment for an Industrie 4.0 Assistance System to Improve the Overall Equipment Effectiveness. In: 7th Conference on Learning Factories, CLF 2017, Bd. 9. Procedia Manufacturing 159–166. · DOI
- Wagner, 2015, Learning Factory for Management, Organization and Workers’ Participation, In: Procedia CIRP, 32, 115
- B. Krückhans, F. Morlock, C. Prinz, S. Freith, D. Kreimeier, B. Kuhlenkötter (2016), Learning Factories Qualify SMEs to Operate a Smart Factory. In: Dimiter Dimitrov und Tiaan Oosthuizen (Hg.): Proceedings of the International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing: COMA’ 2016. Resource Efficiency for Global Competitiveness. South Africa, January 2016. Department of Industrial Engineering Stellenbosch University 457–460.
- Kreimeier, 2014, Holistic Learning Factories – A Concept to Train Lean Management, Resource Efficiency as Well as Management and Organization Improvement Skills, In: Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Bd. 17. Windsor. Procedia CIRP, 17, 184
- Wagner, 2017, Industrie 4.0 impacts on lean production systems, In: The 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 125
- Hambach, 2017, Development of a digital continuous improvement system for production, In: The 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 330
- Meudt, 2016, Wertstromanalyse 4.0, Ganzheitliche Betrachtung von Wertstrom und Informationslogistik in der Produktion. In: ZWF, 111, 319
- Buscher, 2017, Wie sich Industrie 4.0 und Lean gegenseitig befruchten, In: ZWF, 112, 518
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kafuku, J. M. (2019) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.043 · Cited by 57
Lean and Kaizen: The Past and the Future of the Methodologies
Ismyrlis, V. (2021) · Lean Manufacturing · doi:10.5772/intechopen.96169 · Cited by 3
“Despite, the significant differences, between the two concepts, they seem to have the same goal, to increase added value [50].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Prinz, C., Kreggenfeld, N., & Kuhlenkötter, B.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Prinz, Christopher
- Venue
- Procedia Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 21-26
- ISSN
- 2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803096525
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Keywords
- lean manufacturing, Industry 4.0, cyber-physical production systems, digitalization of manufacturing, learning factory, maturity levels, assistance systems, waste reduction, continuous improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
