Cited by 219Digital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsManufacturing Process and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling of Cloud-Based Digital Twins for Smart Manufacturing with MT Connect

Open access
Hu, Liwen, Nguyen, Ngoc-Tu, Tao, Wenjin, Leu, Ming C., Liu, Xiaoqing Frank, Shahriar, Md Rakib, Al Sunny, S M Nahian·2018·Procedia Manufacturing

Abstract

The common modeling of digital twins uses an information model to describe the physical machines. The integration of digital twins into productive cyber-physical cloud manufacturing (CPCM) systems imposes strong demands such as reducing overhead and saving resources. In this paper, we develop and investigate a new method for building cloud-based digital twins (CBDT), which can be adapted to the CPCM platform. Our method helps reduce computing resources in the information processing center for efficient interactions between human users and physical machines. We introduce a knowledge resource center (KRC) built on a cloud server for information intensive applications. An information model for one type of 3D printers is designed and integrated into the core of the KRC as a shared resource. Several experiments are conducted and the results show that the CBDT has an excellent performance compared to existing methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.155

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 219

Metadata

Authors
Hu, L., Nguyen, N.-T., Tao, W., Leu, M. C., Liu, X. F., Shahriar, M. R., & Al Sunny, S. M. N.
Affiliations
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Corresponding author
Tao, Wenjin
Venue
Procedia Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
26
Pages
1193-1203
ISSN
2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886143408
Cited by
219
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
18.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1551448)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Keywords
smart manufacturing, information model, 3D printer, resource efficiency, human-machine interaction, cloud computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review