Assessment of thoraco-abdominal asynchrony
Abstract
Thoraco-abdominal asynchrony is often observed in many respiratory disorders and/or respiratory muscle dysfunctions and clinically assessed as a sign of respiratory distress and increased work of breathing. This review describes the assessment of thoraco-abdominal asynchrony by respiratory inductance plethysmography. Visual inspection of the Konno-Mead plot yields information about the relative contribution of the RC and the ABD to respiration and about respiratory muscle dysfunction in selected patients. The monitoring of thoraco-abdominal asynchrony is a useful, non-invasive indicator of respiratory muscle load or respiratory muscle dysfunction and can be used to determine response to therapy in individual patients. The technique is limited by the fact that it does not detect respiratory muscle fatigue and that the occurrence of TAA does not always correspond to a clinically relevant respiratory problem, especially in the neonatal period.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thoraco-abdominal asynchrony is linked to obstruction, neuromuscular disease and respiratory failure.
“| Thoraco-abdominal asynchrony | 6 | [52–54] | Obstruction Neuromuscular disease Respiratory failure |”
From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [54]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification
Boulding, R., Stacey, R., Niven, R., & Fowler, S. J. (2016) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0088-2015 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Chest wall volume and asynchrony in stroke and Parkinson’s disease subjects: A case-control study
Florêncio, R. B., da Nobrega, A. J. S., Lima, Í. N. D. F., Gualdi, L. P., Cabral, E. E., Fagundes, M. L. L. C., Aliverti, A., Resqueti, V. R., & Fregonezi, G. A. D. F. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216641 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hammer, J., & Newth, C. J. L.
- Affiliations
- University Children’s Hospital Basel (CH)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hammer, J.
- Venue
- Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-80
- ISSN
- 1526-0542 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050013670
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Paediatric Respiratory Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Keywords
- respiratory inductance plethysmography, respiratory muscle dysfunction, respiratory distress, work of breathing, respiratory muscle fatigue, neonatal respiratory disease, non-invasive respiratory monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Abdomen, Humans, Plethysmography, Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Muscles, Thorax, Respiratory Mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review