Recovery from Depression
Abstract
Full recovery from depression, as contrasted with symptom improvement, is a relatively new concept and therapeutic goal. It is an important goal, because the failure to achieve this goal leaves many patients with less productive and fulfilling lives, it leaves some children with lasting deficits, and it deprives families and societies of loved ones’ and employees’ care and investment. As a new therapeutic concept, recovery from depression is not as easy to define as it might seem; many or most patients were not euthymic before an episode of depression or have had some level of depression throughout their lives. There is no measurable definition of euthymia. In addition to definitional difficulties, we need to study and address other barriers to the achievement of recovery from depression. All the barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of depression are barriers against recovery: negative social and professional attitudes, comorbidity, lack of access to demonstrably efficacious professional and social services, and inability to match patients with the antidepressants most likely to help them. Efforts to address many of these knowledge and attitude gaps are already underway. Long-term studies are needed, both observational and experimental. Most published studies encompass only weeks or at best months of follow-up, but recovery must be sustained to be meaningful. As noted previously, there has been little or no attention to the developmental impact of depression. The restoration of premorbid function is not sufficient when depression has hindered a patient’s ability to form satisfying relationships and choose and perform satisfying work. We need to learn how to remediate patients whose history of depression has stifled their talents and aspirations. Studying these issues will not be easy, but millions of individuals with depression, and their physicians, will profit by it; it will be well worth the effort.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A significant proportion of patients with major depressive disorder do not recover baseline levels of psychosocial functioning even when they meet the conventional definition of remission.
“In addition, a significant proportion of patients with MDD do not recover baseline levels of psychosocial functioning even when they meet the conventional definition of remission (e.g. a score ≤7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)) [2, 11, 12], suggesting that non-affective dimensions and domains are critical determinants of functional outcome.”
From Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
Many patients with major depressive disorder do not reach premorbid levels of psychosocial functioning, such that a significant proportion present residual symptoms.
“Only a subset of individuals with MDD (30–40 %) reach symptomatic remission after adequate treatment with a first-line antidepressant, and many patients do not reach premorbid levels of psychosocial functioning, such that a significant proportion of patients present residual symptoms.”
From Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
Major depressive disorder is a prevalent and disabling condition with a high frequency of non-recovery and recurrence, leading to substantial mortality and morbidity.
“Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and disabling condition with a high frequency of non-recovery and recurrence, leading to substantial mortality and morbidity [1–3].”
From Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
Subthreshold depressive symptoms may be associated with substantial psychosocial impairment.
“In fact, the acknowledgement that even subthreshold depressive symptoms may be associated with substantial psychosocial impairment has led some experts to postulate that functional recovery is likely to represent the proper target for MDD treatment [2].”
From Cognitive remission: a novel objective for the treatment of major depression? (2016) · cites this paper as [2]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Stotland, N. L.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stotland, Nada L.
- Venue
- Psychiatric Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-49
- ISSN
- 0193-953X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168756660
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- recovery from depression, depressive episodes, euthymia, barriers to recovery, comorbidities, access to mental health care, antidepressant selection, premorbid functioning, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Child, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Remission Induction, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review