Cited by 77Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchStress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Smaller right hippocampus in war veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder

Pavić, Ladislav, Gregurek, Rudolf, Radoš, Marko, Brkljačić, Boris, Brajković, Lovorka, Šimetin-Pavić, Ivana, Ivanac, Gordana, Pavliša, Goran +1 more·2007·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Chronic stress can putatively cause damage in the human hippocampus, but evidence of damage has not been consistently shown in studies on hippocampal morphology in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We compared hippocampal volumes in PTSD patients and normal subjects. Using a 3D T1-weighted GRE magnetic resonance imaging sequence, we measured hippocampal volumes in 15 war veterans with combat-related chronic PTSD and 15 case-matched normal controls. Although war veterans, our PTSD subjects were not professional soldiers and were mobilized shortly before they were exposed to a very specific combat-related trauma over a 3-day period. In our study, the period between traumatic exposure and imaging was considerably shorter, on average, 9 years, compared with at least two decades in previous studies on subjects with combat-related PTSD. Moreover, our subjects were free of any comorbidity, treatment or medication. The right hippocampus was significantly smaller in PTSD subjects than in healthy controls. The left hippocampus was also smaller in PTSD subjects than in controls, but the difference was not significant. In all PTSD subjects, the right hippocampus was smaller than the left (on average, 7.88%). Our results show smaller volume of the right hippocampus in PTSD patients than in normal subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.08.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 77

Authors
Pavić, L., Gregurek, R., Radoš, M., Brkljačić, B., Brajković, L., Šimetin-Pavić, I., Ivanac, G., Pavliša, G., & Kalousek, V.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Dubrava (HR)
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
Corresponding author
Pavić, Ladislav
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
154
Issue
2
Pages
191-198
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997088942
Cited by
77
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, hippocampal volume, right hippocampus, war veterans, war injuries, hippocampal asymmetry, chronic stress, hippocampal morphology
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review