The associations among hippocampal volume, cortisol reactivity, and memory performance in healthy young men
Abstract
In aged and pathological populations, reduced hippocampal volume is frequently described in association with impairment of hippocampus-dependent cognitive processes and chronically elevated cortisol levels. Recent studies in young healthy subjects show a negative association between hippocampal volume and memory. The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations among hippocampal volume, cortisol levels and memory performance in a group of healthy young men. Hippocampal volume was determined by manual segmentation of high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Images from 13 subjects. Stress-induced cortisol levels in response to the "Trier Social Stress Test" (TSST) as well as the cortisol response to awakening (CRA) over four weeks were assessed. Declarative memory performance was tested before and after exposure to the TSST. The results show that larger hippocampal volume was associated with a significantly stronger cortisol increase in response to the TSST and a significantly greater CRA. Moreover, larger hippocampal volume was associated with significantly lower memory performance before the TSST. Our results challenge the direction of the frequently observed relationships among hippocampal volume, cortisol reactivity and memory performance and question the relevance of findings in clinical and aged subjects for young healthy populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men with larger hippocampi show a greater cortisol awakening response and increased cortisol release in response to social stress.
“Moreover, men with larger hippocampi show a greater cortisol awakening response and increased cortisol release in response to social stress (54), suggesting that larger hippocampal volume may be associated with greater stress reactivity and HPA axis hyperactivity.”
From Neuroanatomic differences associated with stress susceptibility and resilience (2016) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Pruessner, M., Pruessner, J. C., Hellhammer, D. H., Bruce Pike, G., & Lupien, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- Universität Trier (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pruessner, Marita
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005103919
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- hippocampal volume, cortisol response, memory performance, Trier Social Stress Test, declarative memory, stress, healthy young men, hippocampal atrophy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Fluorescence, Health Status, Hippocampus, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Saliva, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Wakefulness, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review