Orbitofrontal, amygdala and hippocampal volumes in teenagers with first-presentation borderline personality disorder
Abstract
It is not known whether the fronto-limbic volume reductions found in adults with established borderline personality disorder (BPD) are present early in the disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), hippocampal and amygdala volumes in a first-presentation teenage BPD sample with minimal exposure to treatment. Groups of 20 BPD patients and 20 healthy control participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Hippocampal, amygdala, OFC and whole brain volumes were estimated and compared between the two groups. Analysis of variance revealed reversal of the normal (right>left) asymmetry of OFC grey matter volume in the BPD group, reflecting right-sided OFC grey matter loss in the BPD group compared with control participants. No significant differences were found for amygdala or hippocampal volumes comparing BPD with control participants. We identified OFC but not hippocampal or amygdala volumetric differences early in the course of BPD. Hippocampal and amygdala volume reductions observed in adult BPD samples might develop during the course of the disorder, although longitudinal studies are needed to examine this.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other research found no relationship between NSSI and OFC, midline structures, or STG.
“Other research found no relationship with the OFC (66), midline structures (67), or STG (68).”
From Neural correlates associated with suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury in youth (2021) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Chanen, A. M., Velakoulis, D., Carison, K., Gaunson, K., Wood, S. J., Yuen, H. P., Yücel, M., Jackson, H. J., McGorry, P. D., & Pantelis, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-125
- ISSN
- 0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009855704
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- National Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, initial presentation, adolescents, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, brain volume, gray matter loss, hemispheric lateralization
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Amygdala, Mental Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reference Values, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review