Cited by 166Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Orbitofrontal, amygdala and hippocampal volumes in teenagers with first-presentation borderline personality disorder

Chanen, Andrew M., Velakoulis, Dennis, Carison, Kate, Gaunson, Karen, Wood, Stephen J., Yuen, Hok Pan, Yücel, Murat, Jackson, Henry J. +2 more·2008·Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging

Abstract

It is not known whether the fronto-limbic volume reductions found in adults with established borderline personality disorder (BPD) are present early in the disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), hippocampal and amygdala volumes in a first-presentation teenage BPD sample with minimal exposure to treatment. Groups of 20 BPD patients and 20 healthy control participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Hippocampal, amygdala, OFC and whole brain volumes were estimated and compared between the two groups. Analysis of variance revealed reversal of the normal (right>left) asymmetry of OFC grey matter volume in the BPD group, reflecting right-sided OFC grey matter loss in the BPD group compared with control participants. No significant differences were found for amygdala or hippocampal volumes comparing BPD with control participants. We identified OFC but not hippocampal or amygdala volumetric differences early in the course of BPD. Hippocampal and amygdala volume reductions observed in adult BPD samples might develop during the course of the disorder, although longitudinal studies are needed to examine this.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.08.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 166

Authors
Chanen, A. M., Velakoulis, D., Carison, K., Gaunson, K., Wood, S. J., Yuen, H. P., Yücel, M., Jackson, H. J., McGorry, P. D., & Pantelis, C.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
163
Issue
2
Pages
116-125
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009855704
Cited by
166
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, initial presentation, adolescents, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, brain volume, gray matter loss, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Mental Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reference Values, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review