Cited by 116Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Increased activation of the left hippocampus region in Complex PTSD during encoding and recognition of emotional words: A pilot study

Thomaes, Kathleen, Dorrepaal, Ethy, Draijer, Nel P.J., de Ruiter, Michiel B., Elzinga, Bernet M., van Balkom, Anton J., Smoor, Paulien L.M., Smit, Johannes +1 more·2009·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

To gain insight into memory disturbances in Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (Complex PTSD), we investigated declarative memory function and medial temporal lobe activity in patients and healthy non-traumatized controls. A case-control study was performed in nine patients with Complex PTSD and nine controls. All respondents performed a declarative memory task with neutral and emotional, negative words during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Memory performance of neutral words was impaired in Complex PTSD with a relative conservation of recall of negative words. Deep encoding of later remembered negative words, as well as correct recognition of negative words and false alarms, was associated with an enhanced Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) response in the left hippocampus extending into the parahippocampal gyrus of Complex PTSD patients compared with controls. Post-hoc volumetric comparisons did not reveal significant anatomical differences in the medial temporal lobe between Complex PTSD patients and controls. We conclude that in Complex PTSD preferential recall of negative words is associated with increased activation in the left hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus during both successful and false recall. These findings support a model of an abnormally functioning hippocampus in Complex PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.03.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 116

Authors
Thomaes, K., Dorrepaal, E., Draijer, N. P. J., de Ruiter, M. B., Elzinga, B. M., van Balkom, A. J., Smoor, P. L. M., Smit, J., & Veltman, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Thomaes, Kathleen
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
171
Issue
1
Pages
44-53
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076033218
Cited by
116
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
complex PTSD, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, declarative memory, emotional words, memory encoding, recognition memory, false alarms, medial temporal lobe, hippocampal activation, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pilot Projects, Speech Perception, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review