Cited by 82Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Striatal dopamine release codes uncertainty in pathological gambling

Linnet, Jakob, Mouridsen, Kim, Peterson, Ericka, Møller, Arne, Doudet, Doris Jeanne, Gjedde, Albert·2012·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Two mechanisms of midbrain and striatal dopaminergic projections may be involved in pathological gambling: hypersensitivity to reward and sustained activation toward uncertainty. The midbrain-striatal dopamine system distinctly codes reward and uncertainty, where dopaminergic activation is a linear function of expected reward and an inverse U-shaped function of uncertainty. In this study, we investigated the dopaminergic coding of reward and uncertainty in 18 pathological gambling sufferers and 16 healthy controls. We used positron emission tomography (PET) with the tracer [(11)C]raclopride to measure dopamine release, and we used performance on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to determine overall reward and uncertainty. We hypothesized that we would find a linear function between dopamine release and IGT performance, if dopamine release coded reward in pathological gambling. If, on the other hand, dopamine release coded uncertainty, we would find an inversely U-shaped function. The data supported an inverse U-shaped relation between striatal dopamine release and IGT performance if the pathological gambling group, but not in the healthy control group. These results are consistent with the hypothesis of dopaminergic sensitivity toward uncertainty, and suggest that dopaminergic sensitivity to uncertainty is pronounced in pathological gambling, but not among non-gambling healthy controls. The findings have implications for understanding dopamine dysfunctions in pathological gambling and addictive behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.04.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 82

Authors
Linnet, J., Mouridsen, K., Peterson, E., Møller, A., Doudet, D. J., & Gjedde, A.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Linnet, Jakob
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
204
Issue
1
Pages
55-60
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015251391
Cited by
82
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Responsible Gaming
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
gambling addiction, striatal dopamine release, uncertainty sensitivity, reward sensitivity, Iowa Gambling Task, dopamine dysregulation, addiction
MeSH terms
Adult, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Gambling, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Radionuclide Imaging, Reward, Behavior, Addictive, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review