Functional MRI of pain application in youth who engaged in repetitive non-suicidal self-injury vs. psychiatric controls
Abstract
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is increasingly common in young psychiatric patients. It is unclear why pain, which should be aversive, becomes reinforcing in this context. We hypothesized that pain- and/or reward-processing neurocircuitry would be abnormal in NSSI patients compared with non-NSSI patients. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we administered a painfully cold and comparison cool stimulus under two conditions: self-administered and experimenter-administered (as a control). Participants comprised 13 NSSI patients and 15 non-NSSI control patients, who were matched for sex, age, medications, symptoms, and diagnoses. Whole-brain analyses of main effects, as well as correlational analyses with subjective pain and "relief" (suggesting reward), were performed. Significant main effects of group showed greater blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response for NSSI than controls in right midbrain/pons; culmen; amygdala; and parahippocampal, inferior frontal and superior temporal gyri; as well as orbital frontal cortex (OFC). The correlation between BOLD signal and "relief" was greater in NSSI patients in areas associated with reward/pain and addiction including thalamus, dorsal striatum and anterior precuneus. Post hoc analysis showed reduced functional connectivity between right OFC and anterior cingulate cortex in NSSI youth, implying possible deficits in the neuroregulation of emotional behavior. These findings help inform how pain is associated with reward for NSSI patients but not for non-NSSI patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to psychiatric controls, self-injurers show greater activation in parahippocampal gyrus, IFG, and amygdala across conditions during painful cold compress.
“Compared to psychiatric controls, self-injurers show greater activation in the parahippocampal gyrus, IFG, and amygdala across conditions (98).”
From Neural correlates associated with suicide and nonsuicidal self-injury in youth (2021) · cites this paper as [98]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Osuch, E., Ford, K., Wrath, A., Bartha, R., & Neufeld, R.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Osuch, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-112
- ISSN
- 0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139392068
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Lawson Health Research Institute
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- non-suicidal self-injury, pain processing, reward processing, adolescents, cold pressor pain, analgesia, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, functional connectivity, amygdala, thalamus, dorsal striatum
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Cold Temperature, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pain, Reward, Case-Control Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review