The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review on application of flocculants in wastewater treatment
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Flocculation is an essential phenomenon in industrial wastewater treatment. Inorganic coagulants (salts of multivalent metals) are being commonly used due to its low cost and ease of use. However, their application is constrained with low flocculating efficiency and the presence of residue metal concentration in the treated water. Organic polymeric flocculants are widely used nowadays due to its remarkable ability to flocculate efficiently with low dosage. However, its application is associated with lack of biodegradability and dispersion of monomers residue in water that may represent a health hazard. Therefore, biopolymers based flocculants have been attracting wide interest of researchers because they have the advantages of biodegradability and environmental friendly. But, natural flocculants are needed in large dosage due to its moderate flocculating efficiency and shorter shelf life. Thus, in order to combine the best properties of both, synthetic polymers are grafted onto the backbone of natural polymers to obtain tailor-made grafted flocculants. This paper gives an overview of the development of different types of flocculants that were being investigated for treatment of industrial wastewater. Furthermore, their flocculation performance will be reviewed and the flocculation mechanism will be discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advancement of Coagulation–Flocculation and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment
Teh, C. Y., Budiman, P. M., Shak, K. P. Y., & Wu, T. Y. (2016) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04703 · Cited by 1,160
Effect of Dye Structure on Color Removal Efficiency by Coagulation
Mcyotto, F., Wei, Q., Macharia, D. K., Huang, M., Shen, C., & Chow, C. W. K. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126674 · Cited by 370
Tangerine, banana and pomegranate peels valorisation for sustainable environment: A review
El Barnossi, A., Moussaid, F., & Iraqi Housseini, A. (2021) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00574 · Cited by 178
Dye Removal by Biosorption Using Cross-Linked Chitosan-Based Hydrogels
Crini, G., Torri, G., Lichtfouse, E., Kyzas, G. Z., Wilson, L. D., & Morin-Crini, N. (2019) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-019-00903-y · Cited by 173
Nourani, M., Baghdadi, M., Javan, M., & Bidhendi, G. N. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.028 · Cited by 82
Yin, Z., Chu, R., Zhu, L., Li, S., Mo, F., Hu, D., & Liu, C. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111159 · Cited by 81
Wastewater treatment as a process and a resource
Pariente, M. I., Segura, Y., Molina, R., & Martínez, F. (2020) · Wastewater Treatment Residues as Resources for Biorefinery Products and Biofuels · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816204-0.00002-3 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C. S., Robinson, J., & Chong, M. F.
- Venue
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 489-508
- ISSN
- 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
- 0957-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2025846683
- Cited by
- 1,103
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.