The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
The paper reviews past progress in the development of methods and models for process safety and risk management and highlights the present research trends; also it outlines the opinions of the authors regarding the future research direction in the field. Based on the open literature published in the leading journals in the field of safety, risk and reliability, the review covers the evolution of the methods and models developed for process safety and risk management. The methods and models are categorized as qualitative, semi-quantitative, quantitative and hybrid. The progress in the last few decades is discussed in the context of the past. Developments in the current decade formulate the basis of the present trends; future directions for research in these fields are also outlined. The aim of the article is to provide a historical development in this field with respect to the driving forces behind the development. It is expected that it will help researchers and industrial practitioners to gain a better understanding of the existing concepts. At the same time the aim is to provide direction to bridge the existing gaps through research and developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new accident model for engineering safer systems
Leveson, N. (2004) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(03)00047-x · Cited by 2,243
Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-1486 · Cited by 992
Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks
Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., & Ciancamerla, E. (2001) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(00)00077-6 · Cited by 933
Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods
Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001) · Cited by 825
Industrial accident prevention
Hienrich, H. W., Peterson, D., & Roos, N. R. (1941) · Cited by 815
Vesely, W. E., Goldberg, F. F., Roberts, N. H., & Haasl, D. F. (1987) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 775
Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches
Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2011) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012 · Cited by 765
Self-citationb'Roberts, N. H. '., b'Vesely, W. E. '., b'Haasl, D. F. '., et al. (1981) · Cited by 671
Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis
Grossel, S. S. (2001) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/s0950-4230(01)00002-x · Cited by 665
Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network
Khakzad, N., Khan, F., & Amyotte, P. (2013) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005 · Cited by 603
Self-citation
Cited by
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“The future of risk assessment and risk management is discussed in SRA (2015b) and Aven and Zio (2014) ; see also reviews and reflections by Venkatasubramanian (2011), Pasman and Reniers (2014) and Khan, Rathnayaka, and Ahmed (2015) .”
BackgroundFault Tree Analysis Improvements: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review
Yazdi, M., Mohammadpour, J., Li, H., Huang, H., Zarei, E., Pirbalouti, R. G., & Adumene, S. (2023) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.3271 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., & Ahmed, S.
- Venue
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 116-147
- ISSN
- 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
- 0957-5820
- OpenAlex
- W1837982956
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 25.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005
- The paper
- Khan, F., Rathnayaka, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Methods and models in process safety and risk management: Past, present and future. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.