CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70Combustion and Detonation ProcessesSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesRisk and Safety Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation and prediction of the safe distance in liquid hydrogen spill accident

Liu, Yuanliang, Liu, Zhan, Wei, Jianjian, Lan, Yuqi, Yang, Shenyin, Jin, Tao·2021·Process Safety and Environmental Protection
DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.037
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Astbury, 2007, Venting of low pressure hydrogen gas: a critique of the literature, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 85, 289, 10.1205/psep06054 · DOI
  2. Battersby, 2013, Modelling the mitigation of a hydrogen deflagration in a nuclear waste silo ullage with water fog, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 91, 476, 10.1016/j.psep.2012.11.001 · DOI
  3. Bultel, 2007, Risk analysis on a fuel cell in electric vehicle using the MADS/MOSAR methodology, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 85, 241, 10.1205/psep06023 · DOI
  4. Giannissi, 2018, Study of key parameters in modeling liquid hydrogen release and dispersion in open environment, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 455, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.128 · DOI
  5. Giannissi, 2014, CFD modeling of hydrogen dispersion under cryogenic release conditions, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 39, 15851, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.042 · DOI
  6. Ichard, 2012, CFD computations of liquid hydrogen releases, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, 17380, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.145 · DOI
  7. Jiang, 2018, Coupling optimization of composite insulation and vapor-cooled shield for on-orbit cryogenic storage tank, Cryogenics, 96, 90, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.10.008 · DOI
  8. Khalil, 2018, Science-based framework for ensuring safe use of hydrogen as an energy carrier and an emission-free transportation fuel, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 117, 326, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.011 · DOI
  9. Kim, 2020, New measurement method for vaporization velocity for spreading cryogenic liquid, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 133, 97, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.11.010 · DOI
  10. Li, 2019, Investigation of vented hydrogen-air deflagrations in a congested vessel, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 129, 196, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.07.009 · DOI
  11. Liu, 2018, Dilution of hazardous vapor cloud in liquid hydrogen spill process under different source conditions, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 7643, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.180 · DOI
  12. Liu, 2019, Spread of hydrogen vapor cloud during continuous liquid hydrogen spills, Cryogenics, 103, 102975, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2019.102975 · DOI
  13. Liu, 2019, Modeling the development of hydrogen vapor cloud considering the presence of air humidity, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 2059, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.123 · DOI
  14. Middha, 2011, Validation of CFD modeling of LH2 spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2620, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.122 · DOI
  15. Moen, 2019, Comparison of k-ε models in gaseous release and dispersion simulations using the CFD code FLACS, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 130, 306, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.016 · DOI
  16. Molnarne, 2019, Hazardous properties of hydrogen and hydrogen containing fuel gases, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 130, 1, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.07.012 · DOI
  17. Pu, 2019, Plume dispersion behaviour and hazard identification for large quantities of liquid hydrogen leakage, Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng., 14, e2299, 10.1002/apj.2299 · DOI
  18. Royle, 2011, The safety of the future hydrogen economy, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 89, 452, 10.1016/j.psep.2011.09.003 · DOI
  19. Shao, 2018, Numerical investigation of flammable cloud on liquid hydrogen spill under various weather conditions, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 5249, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.139 · DOI
  20. Shih, 1995, A new eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows: model development and validation, Comput. Fluids, 24, 227, 10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sklavounos, 2005, Fuel gas dispersion under cryogenic release conditions, Energy Fuels, 19, 2535, 10.1021/ef0500383 · DOI
  22. Statharas, 2000, Analysis of data from spilling experiments performed with liquid hydrogen, J. Hazard. Mater., 77, 57, 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00252-1 · DOI
  23. Tamura, 1999, Wind loading standards and design criteria in Japan, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 83, 555, 10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00101-4 · DOI
  24. Thomas, 2010, Overpressure development during the combustion of a hydrogen-air mixture partial filling a confined space, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 88, 24, 10.1016/j.psep.2009.10.003 · DOI
  25. Tominaga, 2008, AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96, 1749, 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058 · DOI
  26. Venetsanos, 2007, CFD modeling of large-scale LH2 spills in open environment, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1, 2171, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.020 · DOI
  27. Venetsanos, 2003, Source, dispersion and combustion modelling of an accidental release of hydrogen in an urban environment, J. Hazard. Mater., 105, 1, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.05.001 · DOI
  28. Witcofski, 1984, Experimental and analytical analyses of the mechanisms governing the dispersion of flammable clouds formed by liquid hydrogen spills, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 9, 425, 10.1016/0360-3199(84)90064-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Wei, J., Lan, Y., Yang, S., & Jin, T.
Affiliations
  • China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jin, Tao
ORCID
Venue
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
146
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
  • 0957-5820
DOI
10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.037
OpenAlex
W3082729780
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Process Safety and Environmental Protection (publishedVersion)
Funders
China University of Mining and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Combustion and Detonation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords
liquid hydrogen, safety distance, wind speed, atmospheric turbulence, 3D CFD simulation, risk assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review