Crater density differences: Exploring regional resurfacing, secondary crater populations, and crater saturation equilibrium on the moon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CraterIDNet applied a fully convolutional network (FCN) to both visually detect craters in images and match those detected craters to known craters.
“CraterIDNet [8] applied a fully convolutional network (FCN) [9] to both visually detect craters in images and match those detected craters to known craters.”
From Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation Using a Convolutional Neural Network for Visual Crater Detection (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Povilaitis, R. Z., Robinson, M. S., van der Bogert, C. H., Hiesinger, H., Meyer, H. M., & Ostrach, L. R.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Münster (DE)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Povilaitis, R.Z.
- Venue
- Planetary and Space Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 162
- Pages
- 41-51
- ISSN
- 0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613238226
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Planetary and Space Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NASA
- German Aerospace Center (50OW0901, 50OW1504)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
- Keywords
- secondary craters, Orientale basin, intercrater plains, impactor population
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
