Factors that differentiate early vs. later onset of major depression disorder
Abstract
This report explores the relationship between age of first onset of major depression and other demographic and clinical features in the first 1500 patients entering the Sequenced Treatment Alternative to Relieving Depression (STAR*D) study. Outpatients, 18-75 years of age, with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) from either primary care or psychiatric practices constitute the population. Age of onset was defined at study intake by asking patients to estimate the age at which they experienced the onset of their first major depressive episode. This report divides the population in terms of pre-adult (before age 18) onset and adult (age 18 or later) onset. The results suggest that MDD that begins before age 18 has a distinct set of demographic (female gender) and clinical correlates (longer duration of illness; longer current episodes; more episodes; more suicidality; greater symptom severity; more psychiatric symptoms associated with Axis I comorbidity; and more sadness, irritability, agitation and atypical symptom features), and it appears associated with significant psychosocial consequences (lower educational attainment and marriage rates). Thus, pre-adulthood onset MDD is a particularly severe and chronic condition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decreased functional connectomes in areas of the DMN and LIM are related to anhedonia.
“On the other hand, the decreased functional connectomes in areas of the DMN and LIM are considered to be related to anhedonia [62-68]”
From Mapping neurophysiological subtypes of major depressive disorder using normative models of the functional connectome (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Zisook, S., John Rush, A., Albala, A., Alpert, J., Balasubramani, G. K., Fava, M., Husain, M., Sackeim, H., Trivedi, M., & Wisniewski, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zisook, Sidney
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-140
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024843526
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institutes of Health (N01MH90003)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, age of onset, early-onset depression, STAR*D, suicidality, symptom severity, disease duration, psychiatric comorbidity, educational attainment, marital status, psychosocial consequences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Demography, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychology, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Suicide, Age of Onset, Sex Distribution, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review