Cited by 39Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Dissociative disorders among alcohol-dependent inpatients

Evren, Cuneyt, Sar, Vedat, Karadag, Figen, Tamar Gurol, Defne, Karagoz, Mustafa·2007·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of dissociative disorders among inpatients with alcohol dependency. The Dissociative Experiences Scale was used to screen 111 alcohol-dependent patients consecutively admitted to the inpatient unit of a dependency treatment center. Subgroups of 29 patients who scored 30.0 or above and 25 patients who scored below 10.0 were then evaluated with the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule and the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders. The interviewers were blind to the Dissociative Experiences Scale scores. Of the 54 patients evaluated, 10 (9.0% of the original 111) patients had a dissociative disorder. A considerable number of the remaining patients reported a high level of dissociative experiences. Among the dissociative disorder group, nine patients had dissociative disorder not otherwise specified and one patient had depersonalization disorder. Female gender, younger age, history of suicide attempt, childhood emotional and sexual abuse, and neglect were more frequent in the dissociative disorder group than among non-dissociative patients. The dissociative disorder group also had somatization disorder, borderline personality disorder, and lifetime major depression more frequently. For 9 of the 10 dissociative patients, dissociative symptoms started before the onset of alcohol use. Although the probability of having a comorbid dissociative disorder was not higher among alcohol-dependent inpatients than among the general psychiatric inpatients, the dissociative subgroup had distinct features. Many patients without a dissociative disorder diagnosis (predominantly men) provided hints of subtle dissociative psychopathology. Implications of comorbid dissociative disorders and dissociative experiences on prevention and treatment of alcohol dependency and the importance of gender-specific characteristics in this relationship require further study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.08.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 39

Authors
Evren, C., Sar, V., Karadag, F., Tamar Gurol, D., & Karagoz, M.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
152
Issue
2-3
Pages
233-241
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047704867
Cited by
39
References
39
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
dissociative disorders, alcoholism, prevalence, dissociative experiences, dissociative disorder not otherwise specified, depersonalization disorder, comorbidities, childhood abuse, suicide attempts, gender differences, inpatient care, Dissociative Experiences Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Somatoform Disorders, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review