A randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial of modafinil in children and adolescents with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder
Abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common behavioral disorder in childhood, with an estimated prevalence worldwide of 7%-17% among school-aged children. Modafinil is a centrally acting agent that is structurally and pharmacologically different from stimulants such as amphetamine and methylphenidate. It has been reported that modafinil is effective in diminishing the symptoms of ADHD. The aim of the present study was to further evaluate, under double-blind and placebo-controlled conditions, the efficacy of modafinil for ADHD in children and adolescents. Patients were 46 outpatients, children (35 boys and 11 girls) between the ages of 6 and 15 who clearly met the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for ADHD. All study subjects were randomly assigned to receive treatment with modafinil in a film-coated tablet, 200-300 mg/day, depending on weight (200 mg/day for <30 kg and 300 mg/day for >30 kg) (group 1) or placebo (group 2) for a 6-week double-blind, randomized clinical trial. The principal outcome measure was the Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale-IV. Patients were assessed by a psychiatrist at baseline, 14, 28 and 42 days after the medication started. At 6 weeks, modafinil produced a significantly better outcome on the Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores than placebo. Decreased appetite was observed more often in the modafinil group. The results of this study indicate that modafinil significantly improved symptoms of ADHD, was well tolerated, and may open a new window in the treatment of children with ADHD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modafinil and reboxetine have both shown some promise in the treatment of ADHD.
“Modafinil [73] and reboxetine [74,75] have both shown some promise in the treatment of ADHD.”
From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Kahbazi, M., Ghoreishi, A., Rahiminejad, F., Mohammadi, M.-R., Kamalipour, A., & Akhondzadeh, S.
- Affiliations
- Arak University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Akhondzadeh, Shahin
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-237
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043718341
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Keywords
- modafinil, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children and adolescents, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, symptom improvement, tolerability, appetite loss
- MeSH terms
- Modafinil, Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Benzhydryl Compounds, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review