Computerized ambulatory monitoring in mood disorders: Feasibility, compliance, and reactivity
Abstract
Patients with depression (n=20) or bipolar disorder (n=21) completed computerized ambulatory monitoring for three consecutive days. Results indicate satisfactory rates of acceptance and compliance, with no salient fatigue effects. However, some evidence for reactive effects was found. The findings provide support for this approach in the study of mood disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Practice effects were observed in the Husky study, with faster response time over the course of the study.
“Practice effects were observed (faster response time over the course of the study), thus suggesting the importance of considering the potential effects of EMA duration on self-reports [39].”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Husky, M. M., Gindre, C., Mazure, C. M., Brebant, C., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Sanacora, G., & Swendsen, J.
- Affiliations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Husky, Mathilde M.
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 440-442
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145655225
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- mood disorders, depression, bipolar disorder, feasibility, compliance, reactivity, fatigue
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Mood Disorders, Computers, Handheld
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
