Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidities of adult ADHD symptoms in Korea: Results of the Korean epidemiologic catchment area study
Abstract
We examined the prevalence, correlates, and comorbidities of adult attention-deficit hypersensitivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in a Korean community using data from the National Epidemiological Survey of Psychiatric Disorders in Korea conducted in 2006. A total of 6081 subjects aged 18 to 59 years participated in this study. Diagnostic assessments were based on the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Screener and Composite International Diagnostic Interview administered by lay interviewers. The frequencies of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) disorders, sleep disturbances, and suicidal tendency were compared in the ADHD and non-ADHD groups. Odds ratios and significance levels were calculated. The 6 month prevalence of adult ADHD symptoms was 1.1%. Associations between ADHD symptoms and alcohol abuse/dependence, nicotine dependence, mood disorders, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, somatoform disorder, sleep disturbances, and suicidality were overwhelmingly positive and significant (P<0.05), after controlling for gender and age. Adult ADHD symptoms are highly associated with substance abuse, mood and anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, sleep disturbances and suicidality, suggesting that clinicians should carefully evaluate and treat such psychiatric disorders in adults with ADHD symptoms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two studies applied a cut-off of minimum four out of six symptoms present.
“Two studies applied a cut-off of minimum four out of six symptoms present (a more strict cut-off) (Park et al., 2011;Wynchank et al., 2018).”
From Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Park, S., Cho, M. J., Chang, S. M., Jeon, H. J., Cho, S.-J., Kim, B.-S., Bae, J. N., Wang, H.-R., Ahn, J. H., & Hong, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Asan Medical Center (KR)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Kyungpook National University (KR)
- Samsung Medical Center (KR)
- Gachon University (KR)
- Inha University (KR)
- Ulsan University Hospital (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Hong, Jin Pyo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 378-383
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099898717
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, ADHD symptoms, prevalence, comorbidities, substance abuse, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, sleep disorders, suicidality, Korean adults
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Catchment Area, Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Suicide, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Republic of Korea, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review