Preliminary investigation of web-camera delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Abstract
This study reports a waitlist controlled randomized trial of family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy delivered via web-camera (W-CBT) in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thirty-one primarily Caucasian youth with OCD (range=7-16years; 19 male) were randomly assigned to W-CBT or a Waitlist control. Assessments were conducted immediately before and after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up (for W-CBT arm only). Primary outcomes included the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), clinical global improvement rates, and remission status. When controlling for baseline group differences, W-CBT was superior to the Waitlist control on all primary outcome measures with large effect sizes (Cohen's d≥1.36). Thirteen of 16 youth (81%) in the W-CBT arm were treatment responders, versus only 2/15 (13%) youth in the Waitlist arm. Similarly, 9/16 (56%) individuals in the W-CBT group met remission criteria, versus 2/15 (13%) individuals in the Waitlist control. Gains were generally maintained in a naturalistic 3-month follow-up for those randomized to W-CBT. This preliminary study suggests that W-CBT may be helpful in reducing obsessive-compulsive symptoms in youth with OCD. Given considerable access issues, such findings hold considerable promise for treatment dissemination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The efficacy of individual CBT via videoconference compared to waitlist groups has been demonstrated.
“y se ha demostrado su eficacia comparada con grupos de lista de espera (Storch et al., 2011; Vogel et al., 2014).”
From Terapia cognitivo-conductual grupal por videoconferencia para el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo: Estudio piloto. (2023) · cites this paper as Storch et al., 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 240
- Authors
- Storch, E. A., Caporino, N. E., Morgan, J. R., Lewin, A. B., Rojas, A., Brauer, L., Larson, M. J., & Murphy, T. K.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US)
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Storch, Eric A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-412
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081271683
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, children and adolescents, online therapy, videoconferencing, treatment dissemination, remission, treatment response, Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review