Cited by 240Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Preliminary investigation of web-camera delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Storch, Eric A., Caporino, Nicole E., Morgan, Jessica R., Lewin, Adam B., Rojas, Ariz, Brauer, Lindsay, Larson, Michael J., Murphy, Tanya K.·2011·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

This study reports a waitlist controlled randomized trial of family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy delivered via web-camera (W-CBT) in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thirty-one primarily Caucasian youth with OCD (range=7-16years; 19 male) were randomly assigned to W-CBT or a Waitlist control. Assessments were conducted immediately before and after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up (for W-CBT arm only). Primary outcomes included the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), clinical global improvement rates, and remission status. When controlling for baseline group differences, W-CBT was superior to the Waitlist control on all primary outcome measures with large effect sizes (Cohen's d≥1.36). Thirteen of 16 youth (81%) in the W-CBT arm were treatment responders, versus only 2/15 (13%) youth in the Waitlist arm. Similarly, 9/16 (56%) individuals in the W-CBT group met remission criteria, versus 2/15 (13%) individuals in the Waitlist control. Gains were generally maintained in a naturalistic 3-month follow-up for those randomized to W-CBT. This preliminary study suggests that W-CBT may be helpful in reducing obsessive-compulsive symptoms in youth with OCD. Given considerable access issues, such findings hold considerable promise for treatment dissemination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.05.047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 240

Authors
Storch, E. A., Caporino, N. E., Morgan, J. R., Lewin, A. B., Rojas, A., Brauer, L., Larson, M. J., & Murphy, T. K.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Storch, Eric A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
189
Issue
3
Pages
407-412
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081271683
Cited by
240
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, children and adolescents, online therapy, videoconferencing, treatment dissemination, remission, treatment response, Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review