Cited by 29Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryHallucinations in medical conditions

Psychotic-Like or Unusual Subjective Experiences? The role of certainty in the appraisal of the subclinical psychotic phenotype

Preti, Antonio, Cella, Matteo, Raballo, Andrea, Vellante, Marcello·2012·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The multi-dimensional features of Unusual Subjective Experiences (USEs) may be more accurate indicators of psychosis-proneness than simple frequency count. We tested whether subjective certainty or uncertainty of the occurrence of USEs can influence perceived wellbeing. Five hundred and four undergraduate students completed measures of delusion- and hallucination-proneness, general health and emotional processing. Participants' responses on the delusion- and hallucination-proneness scales were dichotomized on the basis of their certainty level. Results showed that, USEs rated with certainty were associated with poor self-perceived health and difficult emotional processing, while those rated with uncertainty were not. Certainty of USEs was associated with increased distress and may be important in characterizing psychopathological significance. Specific characteristics associated with USEs may be more important than their frequency in predicting psychosis risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 29

Authors
Preti, A., Cella, M., Raballo, A., & Vellante, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Preti, Antonio
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
200
Issue
2-3
Pages
669-673
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077522632
Cited by
29
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Cagliari
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
psychotic-like experiences, delusion proneness, hallucination proneness, psychosis risk, health perception, emotional processing, distress
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Delusions, Emotions, Female, Hallucinations, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review