The severity of Internet addiction risk and its relationship with the severity of borderline personality features, childhood traumas, dissociative experiences, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish University Students
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of Internet addiction (IA) risk with the severity of borderline personality features, childhood traumas, dissociative experiences, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish university students. A total of 271 Turkish university students participated in this study. The students were assessed through the Internet Addiction Scale (IAS), the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-28), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The rates of students were 19.9% (n=54) in the high IA risk group, 38.7% (n=105) in the mild IA risk group and 41.3% (n=112) in the group without IA risk. Correlation analyses revealed that the severity of IA risk was related with BPI, DES, emotional abuse, CTQ-28, depression and anxiety scores. Univariate covariance analysis (ANCOVA) indicated that the severity of borderline personality features, emotional abuse, depression and anxiety symptoms were the predictors of IAS score, while gender had no effect on IAS score. Among childhood trauma types, emotional abuse seems to be the main predictor of IA risk severity. Borderline personality features predicted the severity of IA risk together with emotional abuse, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish university students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traumatic experiences in early childhood, especially neglect and abuse, can lead to a higher risk of pathological internet use in adolescents.
“Traumatic experiences in early childhood, especially neglect and abuse, can lead to a higher risk of pathological internet use in adolescents (Dalbudak et al., 2014).”
From The relationship between childhood trauma and internet addiction in adolescents: A meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Dalbudak et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Dalbudak, E., Evren, C., Aldemir, S., & Evren, B.
- Affiliations
- Turgut Özal University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Dalbudak, Ercan
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 577-582
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014376326
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 24.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Malatya Turgut Özal University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- internet addiction, borderline personality traits, childhood trauma, emotional abuse, dissociative experiences, depression, anxiety, university students, Turkish students, Internet Addiction Scale, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Dissociative Experiences Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Severity of Illness Index, Students, Turkey, Universities, Behavior, Addictive, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review