Cited by 145Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The severity of Internet addiction risk and its relationship with the severity of borderline personality features, childhood traumas, dissociative experiences, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish University Students

Dalbudak, Ercan, Evren, Cuneyt, Aldemir, Secil, Evren, Bilge·2014·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of Internet addiction (IA) risk with the severity of borderline personality features, childhood traumas, dissociative experiences, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish university students. A total of 271 Turkish university students participated in this study. The students were assessed through the Internet Addiction Scale (IAS), the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-28), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The rates of students were 19.9% (n=54) in the high IA risk group, 38.7% (n=105) in the mild IA risk group and 41.3% (n=112) in the group without IA risk. Correlation analyses revealed that the severity of IA risk was related with BPI, DES, emotional abuse, CTQ-28, depression and anxiety scores. Univariate covariance analysis (ANCOVA) indicated that the severity of borderline personality features, emotional abuse, depression and anxiety symptoms were the predictors of IAS score, while gender had no effect on IAS score. Among childhood trauma types, emotional abuse seems to be the main predictor of IA risk severity. Borderline personality features predicted the severity of IA risk together with emotional abuse, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish university students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traumatic experiences in early childhood, especially neglect and abuse, can lead to a higher risk of pathological internet use in adolescents.

    “Traumatic experiences in early childhood, especially neglect and abuse, can lead to a higher risk of pathological internet use in adolescents (Dalbudak et al., 2014).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 145

Authors
Dalbudak, E., Evren, C., Aldemir, S., & Evren, B.
Affiliations
Turgut Özal University (TR)
Corresponding author
Dalbudak, Ercan
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
219
Issue
3
Pages
577-582
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014376326
Cited by
145
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5
FWCI
24.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Malatya Turgut Özal University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
internet addiction, borderline personality traits, childhood trauma, emotional abuse, dissociative experiences, depression, anxiety, university students, Turkish students, Internet Addiction Scale, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Dissociative Experiences Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Severity of Illness Index, Students, Turkey, Universities, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review