A comparison of capacities for social cognition and metacognition in first episode and prolonged depression
Abstract
There is a growing awareness that social cognition is a valuable construct for understanding the psycho-social disabilities in depressive illness. Numerous studies have linked affective disorders to impairments in social cognition and specifically the processing of discrete emotional stimuli. Only few studies have investigated the relation between the burden of depressive illness and social cognitive ability. To study these issues, we compared a group of first-episode depressed patients with a group of chronically depressed patients (duration >2 years) on a broad array of higher-order social cognitive measures including the metacognition assessment scale abbreviated. Contrary to prediction, deficits in social cognition were roughly equivalent between the two groups and there was no significant link between symptom severity and social cognitive ability. Having moderate to severe major depressive disorder (MDD) could be sufficient to predict the presence of deficits in social cognitive ability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social cognitive disturbances are present in autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression.
“While scant systematic direct comparisons have been conducted between bvFTD and the most relevant PPD, it is known that social cognitive disturbances are present in autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression (APA, 2013; Ladegaard et al. , 2014; Bora et al. , 2016; Bonfils et al. , 2017).”
From Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020) · cites this paper as Ladegaard et al. , 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Ladegaard, N., Lysaker, P. H., Larsen, E. R., & Videbech, P.
- Affiliations
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Ladegaard, Nicolai
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 883-889
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067140996
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- social cognition, metacognition, first-episode depression, chronic depression, major depressive disorder, symptom severity, emotional processing, social cognition deficits
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Emotional Intelligence, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review