Frequency and functions of non-suicidal self-injury: Associations with suicidal thoughts and behaviors
Abstract
Previous research has found associations between non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), yet the nature of this relationship remains equivocal. The goal of the present study was to examine how lifetime NSSI frequency and individual NSSI functions relate to a history of suicidal ideation, plan, and attempt. Data were collected via a large (N=13,396) web-based survey of university students between the ages of 18 and 29. After demographics and psychiatric conditions were controlled for, we found a positive curvilinear relationship between NSSI frequency and each of the suicide outcomes. When examined among those with STBs, bipolar disorder and problematic substance use remained positively associated with risk for suicide attempt, but not NSSI. Analyses of individual NSSI functions showed differential associations with STBs of varying severity. Specifically, nearly every NSSI function was significantly related to suicide attempt, with functions related to avoiding committing suicide, coping with self-hatred, and feeling generation (anti-dissociation) showing the strongest risks for suicide attempt. From both clinical and research perspectives, these findings suggest the importance of assessing multiple reasons for engaging in self-injury.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These response rates compare favourably to those achieved in other large-scale prospective college student surveys (39-44%).
“However, these response rates compare favourably to those achieved in other large-scale prospective college student surveys (39-44%) (Eisenberg, Hunt, & Speer, 2013; Paul, Tsypes, Eidlitz, Ernhout, & Whitlock, 2015).”
From Severe role impairment associated with mental disorders: Results of the WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project (2018) · cites this paper as Paul et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Paul, E., Tsypes, A., Eidlitz, L., Ernhout, C., & Whitlock, J.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- City University of New York (US)
- Adelphi University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paul, Elise
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 276-282
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976541814
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, suicide planning, bipolar disorder, problematic substance use, self-hatred, university students, young adults
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Risk, Suicide, Attempted, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review