Enhanced error related negativity amplitude in medication-naïve, comorbidity-free obsessive compulsive disorder
Abstract
Error monitoring and response inhibition is a key cognitive deficit in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Frontal midline regions such as the cingulate cortex and pre-supplementary motor area are considered critical brain substrates of this deficit. Electrophysiological equivalent of the above dysfunction is a fronto-central event related potential (ERP) which occurs after an error called the error related negativity (ERN). In this study, we sought to compare the ERN parameters between medication-naïve, comorbidity-free subjects with OCD and healthy controls (HC). Age, sex and handedness matched subjects with medication-naïve, comorbidity-free OCD (N = 16) and Healthy Controls (N = 17) performed a modified version of the flanker task while EEG was acquired for ERN. EEG signals were recorded from the electrodes FCz and Cz. Clinical severity of OCD was assessed using the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. The subjects with OCD had significantly greater ERN amplitude at Cz and FCz. There were no significant correlations between ERN measures and illness severity measures. Overactive performance monitoring as evidenced by enhanced ERN amplitude could be considered as a biomarker for OCD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Nawani, H., Narayanaswamy, J. C., Basavaraju, S., Bose, A., Mahavir Agarwal, S., Venkatasubramanian, G., & Janardhan Reddy, Y. C.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Narayanaswamy, Janardhanan.C.
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 262
- Pages
- 373-377
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754602627
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- INSPIRE (IFA 12-LSBM 26)
- Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (BT/PR13334/Med/30/259/2009)
- Department of Biotechnology Government of India (BT/06/IYBA/2012)
- Wellcome Trust (500236/Z/11/Z)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, error-related negativity, error monitoring, response inhibition, performance monitoring, drug-naive patients, flanker task, cingulate cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, biomarkers, clinical severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review