Empowerment, PTSD and revictimization among women who have experienced intimate partner violence
Abstract
Empowerment is associated with lower posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and intimate partner violence (IPV) revictimization, but the direction of these associations remains unknown. Two models were assessed: one in which empowerment is protective against future IPV revictimization and PTSD symptoms, and one in which PTSD symptoms lead to reductions in empowerment and increases in IPV revictimization. Drawn from a probability-based access survey panel of U.S. adults, the present sample included 101 women veterans who experienced past-year IPV. Baseline demographics were assessed (T0), with surveys conducted at Time 1 (T1; 18-month interim), and Time 2 (T2; 6-month interim). Cross-lagged panel models assessed the two models separately among women who reported only T1 psychological IPV victimization (58%) and women who reported T1 physical and/or sexual IPV victimization. Among psychological IPV victims, T1 empowerment was significantly associated with decreased T2 PTSD symptoms, whereas among women who reported physical and/or sexual IPV victimization, T1 empowerment was significantly associated with decreased T2 IPV revictimization. The model in which PTSD symptoms confer risk for lower empowerment was not supported; however, higher T1 PTSD symptoms were associated with increased IPV revictimization among women who reported psychological IPV only. Findings can inform interventions for IPV survivors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 21 additional PTSD studies not convertible to Hedges g or odds ratio, 16 demonstrated a positive association between psychological violence and PTSD, while 5 were insignificant.
“Of these, 16 studies demonstrated a positive association between psychological violence and PTSD [32–47], while the remaining five studies were insignificant [48–52].”
From The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: a systematic review with meta-analyses (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
Of 37 additional studies on depression, 29 found a significant association between psychological violence and depression.
“Another 37 studies examined the association between psychological violence and depression; twenty-nine of the identified studies found a significant association [13, 34, 35, 39, 42, 45–47, 49, 53–73], while five studies found a non-significant association [50, 74–77].”
From The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: a systematic review with meta-analyses (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Dardis, C. M., Dichter, M. E., & Iverson, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dardis, Christina M.
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 266
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806992184
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (5R25MH08091607)
- Department of Veterans Affairs
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- empowerment, post-traumatic stress disorder, intimate partner violence, revictimization, women veterans, psychological violence, physical abuse, sexual abuse, IPV survivors, cross-lagged panel model, causal direction
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Power, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Sexual Behavior, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Crime Victims, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review