Cited by 53Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and Trauma

Empowerment, PTSD and revictimization among women who have experienced intimate partner violence

Dardis, Christina M., Dichter, Melissa E., Iverson, Katherine M.·2018·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Empowerment is associated with lower posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and intimate partner violence (IPV) revictimization, but the direction of these associations remains unknown. Two models were assessed: one in which empowerment is protective against future IPV revictimization and PTSD symptoms, and one in which PTSD symptoms lead to reductions in empowerment and increases in IPV revictimization. Drawn from a probability-based access survey panel of U.S. adults, the present sample included 101 women veterans who experienced past-year IPV. Baseline demographics were assessed (T0), with surveys conducted at Time 1 (T1; 18-month interim), and Time 2 (T2; 6-month interim). Cross-lagged panel models assessed the two models separately among women who reported only T1 psychological IPV victimization (58%) and women who reported T1 physical and/or sexual IPV victimization. Among psychological IPV victims, T1 empowerment was significantly associated with decreased T2 PTSD symptoms, whereas among women who reported physical and/or sexual IPV victimization, T1 empowerment was significantly associated with decreased T2 IPV revictimization. The model in which PTSD symptoms confer risk for lower empowerment was not supported; however, higher T1 PTSD symptoms were associated with increased IPV revictimization among women who reported psychological IPV only. Findings can inform interventions for IPV survivors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 53

Authors
Dardis, C. M., Dichter, M. E., & Iverson, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Dardis, Christina M.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
266
Pages
103-110
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806992184
Cited by
53
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R25MH08091607)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
empowerment, post-traumatic stress disorder, intimate partner violence, revictimization, women veterans, psychological violence, physical abuse, sexual abuse, IPV survivors, cross-lagged panel model, causal direction
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Power, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Sexual Behavior, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review