Childhood trauma and somatic symptoms among psychiatric outpatients: investigating the role of shame and guilt
Abstract
Previous research suggests a link between experiences of childhood maltreatment and adult somatic symptom distress. Contributing mechanisms, however, are not yet well understood. It is possible that shame and guilt may function as mediators in the relationship between childhood trauma and adult somatic distress. The present study was developed to investigate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and adult somatic distress, including the potential mediating role of shame and guilt, among psychiatric outpatients. Using data from a sample of 99 Canadian psychiatric outpatients, mediation models with shame and guilt as parallel mediators were evaluated for relationships between childhood emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and somatic symptoms. Controlling for current depressive symptoms, a significant indirect effect was found for the relationship between emotional abuse and shame, but not guilt, in contributing to somatic symptoms. A similar result was obtained regarding the mediating role of shame in the relationship between emotional neglect and somatic symptoms. Mediation was non-significant regarding childhood sexual abuse, which was directly related to somatic distress after controlling for depressive symptoms. The findings provide further evidence of the link between childhood trauma and somatic symptom distress, with shame as a mechanism for the effects of emotional abuse and neglect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acceptance and commitment therapy is associated with an improvement in emotion regulation and a decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms for those with early psychosis and those with severe mental illness with comorbid traumatic childhood experiences.
“Studies support that this intervention is associated with an improvement in emotion regulation and a decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms for those with early psychosis (51) as well as those with SMI with comorbid traumatic childhood experiences (55).”
From Mobile intervention for individuals with psychosis, dual disorders, and their common comorbidities: A literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Kealy, D., Rice, S. M., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Spidel, A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kealy, David
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 268
- Pages
- 169-174
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2812028233
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- child abuse, somatic symptoms, shame, guilt, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, psychiatric outpatients, depressive symptoms, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adult, Canada, Child, Child Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shame, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review