Cited by 54Child Abuse and TraumaPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Childhood trauma and somatic symptoms among psychiatric outpatients: investigating the role of shame and guilt

Kealy, David, Rice, Simon M., Ogrodniczuk, John S., Spidel, Alicia·2018·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Previous research suggests a link between experiences of childhood maltreatment and adult somatic symptom distress. Contributing mechanisms, however, are not yet well understood. It is possible that shame and guilt may function as mediators in the relationship between childhood trauma and adult somatic distress. The present study was developed to investigate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and adult somatic distress, including the potential mediating role of shame and guilt, among psychiatric outpatients. Using data from a sample of 99 Canadian psychiatric outpatients, mediation models with shame and guilt as parallel mediators were evaluated for relationships between childhood emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and somatic symptoms. Controlling for current depressive symptoms, a significant indirect effect was found for the relationship between emotional abuse and shame, but not guilt, in contributing to somatic symptoms. A similar result was obtained regarding the mediating role of shame in the relationship between emotional neglect and somatic symptoms. Mediation was non-significant regarding childhood sexual abuse, which was directly related to somatic distress after controlling for depressive symptoms. The findings provide further evidence of the link between childhood trauma and somatic symptom distress, with shame as a mechanism for the effects of emotional abuse and neglect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.072

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy is associated with an improvement in emotion regulation and a decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms for those with early psychosis and those with severe mental illness with comorbid traumatic childhood experiences.

    “Studies support that this intervention is associated with an improvement in emotion regulation and a decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms for those with early psychosis (51) as well as those with SMI with comorbid traumatic childhood experiences (55).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 54

Authors
Kealy, D., Rice, S. M., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Spidel, A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Kealy, David
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
268
Pages
169-174
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2812028233
Cited by
54
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
child abuse, somatic symptoms, shame, guilt, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, psychiatric outpatients, depressive symptoms, mediation
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adult, Canada, Child, Child Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shame, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review