Cited by 7Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

An initial investigation of the unique relationship between disgust propensity and body dysmorphic disorder

Wilver, Natalie L., Summers, Berta J., Garratt, Grace H., Carlton, Corinne N., Cougle, Jesse R.·2018·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Disgust is a universal emotion that has received recent empirical attention for its potential role in various forms of psychopathology. We conducted two studies using varying methods to explore the relationship between disgust propensity, a construct related to obsessive-compulsive symptomatology, and symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). Study 1 found a significant and unique (i.e., above and beyond co-occurring depression and anxiety) relationship between higher disgust propensity and more severe BDD symptoms, as measured by a standardized self-report and via an in-vivo task aimed at eliciting BDD-related concerns (N = 200). In Study 2, a clinical sample of individuals with BDD (N = 50) reported higher disgust propensity compared to mentally healthy controls (N = 36). This finding remained significant when controlling for depression and anxiety. Findings are the first to our knowledge to demonstrate a relationship between disgust propensity and BDD symptoms and provide directions for future research exploring the role of disgust in BDD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.056

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A saját arc 5 percig tartó nézése következményeként létrejön a testtel kapcsolatos undor érzése.

    “Ennek következményeként létrejön a saját küls ő -akár erkölcsi alapú -leértékelés e (Lambrou, Veale és Wilson, 2012), a testtel kapcsolatos undor érzése (Stasik-O ' Brian és Schmidt, 2018; Wilver, Summers, Garratt, Carlton és Cougle, 2018) és a kinézettel kapcsolatos maladaptív gondolatok jelentkezése (Hartmann, Thomas, Greenberg, Elliott, Matheny és Wilhelm, 2015).”

    From A testdiszmorfiás zavar pszichológiai vonatkozásai (2023) · cites this paper as Wilver, Summers, Garratt, Carlton és Cougle, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilver, N. L., Summers, B. J., Garratt, G. H., Carlton, C. N., & Cougle, J. R.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cougle, Jesse R.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
269
Pages
237-243
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886822098
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
disgust propensity, body dysmorphic disorder, disgust, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, depression, anxiety
MeSH terms
Disgust, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychopathology, Young Adult, Body Dysmorphic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review