Short abstinence from online social networking sites reduces perceived stress, especially in excessive users
Abstract
Online social networking sites (SNSs), such as Facebook, provide frequent and copious social reinforcers (e.g., "likes") delivered at variable time intervals. As a result, some SNS users display excessive, maladaptive behaviors on these platforms. Excessive SNS users, and typical users alike, are often aware of their intense use and psychological dependence on these sites, which may lead to elevated stress. In fact, research has demonstrated that use of SNSs alone induces elevated stress. Other research has begun to investigate the effects of short periods of SNS abstinence, revealing beneficial effects on subjective wellbeing. We aligned these two lines of research and hypothesized that a short period of SNS abstinence would induce a reduction in perceived stress, especially in excessive users. The results confirmed our hypothesis and revealed that both typical and excessive SNS users experienced reduction in perceived stress following SNS abstinence of several days. The effects were particularly pronounced in excessive SNS users. The reduction in stress was not associated with academic performance increases. These results indicate a benefit-at least temporarily-of abstinence from SNSs and provide important information for therapists treating patients who struggle with excessive SNS use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Turel et al. found that a week of social media abstinence reduced perceived stress levels, but only for excessive social media users.
“Pointing to the modulating role of individual differences, Turel et al. (44) found that a week of social media abstinence reduced perceived stress levels, but only for excessive social media users.”
From Does Social Media Use Increase Depressive Symptoms? A Reverse Causation Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Turel, O., Cavagnaro, D. R., & Meshi, D.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Fullerton (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Turel, Ofir
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 270
- Pages
- 947-953
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899779308
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 27.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- online social networking sites, perceived stress, excessive social media use, psychological dependence, subjective well-being, academic performance, Facebook
- MeSH terms
- Online Social Networking, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Stress, Psychological, Students, Temperance, Young Adult, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review