Cited by 113Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyMental Health via Writing

Short abstinence from online social networking sites reduces perceived stress, especially in excessive users

Turel, Ofir, Cavagnaro, Daniel R., Meshi, Dar·2018·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Online social networking sites (SNSs), such as Facebook, provide frequent and copious social reinforcers (e.g., "likes") delivered at variable time intervals. As a result, some SNS users display excessive, maladaptive behaviors on these platforms. Excessive SNS users, and typical users alike, are often aware of their intense use and psychological dependence on these sites, which may lead to elevated stress. In fact, research has demonstrated that use of SNSs alone induces elevated stress. Other research has begun to investigate the effects of short periods of SNS abstinence, revealing beneficial effects on subjective wellbeing. We aligned these two lines of research and hypothesized that a short period of SNS abstinence would induce a reduction in perceived stress, especially in excessive users. The results confirmed our hypothesis and revealed that both typical and excessive SNS users experienced reduction in perceived stress following SNS abstinence of several days. The effects were particularly pronounced in excessive SNS users. The reduction in stress was not associated with academic performance increases. These results indicate a benefit-at least temporarily-of abstinence from SNSs and provide important information for therapists treating patients who struggle with excessive SNS use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Turel et al. found that a week of social media abstinence reduced perceived stress levels, but only for excessive social media users.

    “Pointing to the modulating role of individual differences, Turel et al. (44) found that a week of social media abstinence reduced perceived stress levels, but only for excessive social media users.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 113

Authors
Turel, O., Cavagnaro, D. R., & Meshi, D.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Turel, Ofir
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
270
Pages
947-953
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899779308
Cited by
113
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 5
FWCI
27.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
online social networking sites, perceived stress, excessive social media use, psychological dependence, subjective well-being, academic performance, Facebook
MeSH terms
Online Social Networking, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Stress, Psychological, Students, Temperance, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review