Sleep and suicidality in school-aged adolescents: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up
Abstract
Current evidence about the association between sleep and suicide are conflicting. This study aimed to investigate the association between sleep duration and quality with suicidal behaviors in a group of school-aged adolescents in China. The baseline survey was conducted among Chinese adolescents aged 12-13 years in October 2016. All participants were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. After 2 years follow-up, a total of 1513 adolescents completed the follow-up. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that shorter sleep duration (<8 h per night) in baseline was associated with an increased likelihood of suicidality in boys [suicidal ideation, adjusted odds ratio (OR)=2.18, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.97 to 3.98; suicide planning, OR=2.47, 95% CI=1.22 to 5.01; suicide attempt, OR=2.97, 95% CI=1.39 to 6.38]. Similarly, poor sleep quality [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ≧ 5] was associated with an increased likelihood of suicidal ideation and suicide planning in boys (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.15 to 3.99 and OR=2.47, 95% CI=1.16 to 5.25, respectively). This study indicates that school-aged boys are more likely to experience suicidality in exposure to short sleep or poor sleep quality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No trials have tested whole-of-school approaches, or universal interventions like late school start times, or interventions that target broader social-cultural determinants.
“We note that no trials have tested whole-of-school approaches, or universal interventions like late school start times (an intervention that aligns with adolescents' circadian clock, improving the amount of sleep they get, and in turn their mood; Adolescent Sleep Working Group 2014; Gong 2020; Lovato 2014), or interventions that target broader social-cultural determinants.”
From Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings (2024) · cites this paper as Gong 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Gong, Q., Li, S., Wang, S., Li, H., & Han, L.
- Affiliations
- Ningbo University (CN)
- Ningbo Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Hui
- Han, Liyuan
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 287
- Pages
- 112918
- ISSN
- 0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012180633
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- sleep duration, sleep quality, suicidality, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, school-age adolescents, sex differences, Chinese adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, China, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Schools, Sleep, Time Factors, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review