Cited by 33Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

Sleep and suicidality in school-aged adolescents: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up

Gong, Qinghai, Li, Sixuan, Wang, Sijia, Li, Hui, Han, Liyuan·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Current evidence about the association between sleep and suicide are conflicting. This study aimed to investigate the association between sleep duration and quality with suicidal behaviors in a group of school-aged adolescents in China. The baseline survey was conducted among Chinese adolescents aged 12-13 years in October 2016. All participants were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. After 2 years follow-up, a total of 1513 adolescents completed the follow-up. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that shorter sleep duration (<8 h per night) in baseline was associated with an increased likelihood of suicidality in boys [suicidal ideation, adjusted odds ratio (OR)=2.18, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.97 to 3.98; suicide planning, OR=2.47, 95% CI=1.22 to 5.01; suicide attempt, OR=2.97, 95% CI=1.39 to 6.38]. Similarly, poor sleep quality [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ≧ 5] was associated with an increased likelihood of suicidal ideation and suicide planning in boys (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.15 to 3.99 and OR=2.47, 95% CI=1.16 to 5.25, respectively). This study indicates that school-aged boys are more likely to experience suicidality in exposure to short sleep or poor sleep quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112918

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No trials have tested whole-of-school approaches, or universal interventions like late school start times, or interventions that target broader social-cultural determinants.

    “We note that no trials have tested whole-of-school approaches, or universal interventions like late school start times (an intervention that aligns with adolescents' circadian clock, improving the amount of sleep they get, and in turn their mood; Adolescent Sleep Working Group 2014; Gong 2020; Lovato 2014), or interventions that target broader social-cultural determinants.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 33

Authors
Gong, Q., Li, S., Wang, S., Li, H., & Han, L.
Affiliations
  • Ningbo University (CN)
  • Ningbo Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Hui
  • Han, Liyuan
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
287
Pages
112918
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012180633
Cited by
33
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep duration, sleep quality, suicidality, suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, school-age adolescents, sex differences, Chinese adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, China, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Schools, Sleep, Time Factors, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review