Cited by 67Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

The Role of Psychiatrists and Mental Disorder in Assisted Dying Practices Around the World: A Review of the Legislation and Official Reports

McCormack, Ruaidhrí, Fléchais, Rémy·2012·Psychosomatics

Abstract

Objective To establish the role of psychiatrists and mental disorder in assisted dying practices in countries and states where such practices are legal.Methods The authors reviewed the Assisted Dying Acts and official statistical reports from Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, and the states of Washington and Oregon in the U.S.A. The data extracted related to the role of psychiatrists in assisted dying practices, and the relevance of capacity, 'suffering', and mental disorder.Results A psychiatry referral is recommended or required by all countries and states in certain circumstances. These circumstances include mental disorder 'impairing judgement' in Oregon and Washington, and cases of exclusive mental disorder in European countries. 'Exclusive mental disorder' refers to those with a mental disorder (e.g., major depression) who apply for assisted dying in the absence of any terminal physical illness. Capacity/competence and necessary suffering must be present. On average, 5.4% (range 4.2%-6.7%) of applicants see a psychiatrist. Patients with exclusive mental disorder can apply for assisted dying in European countries but not in Oregon and Washington; actual figures are low.Conclusions No country has a blanket policy of mandatory psychiatric review but the specialty contributes in circumstances of exclusive mental disorder or when there is doubt regarding capacity and sound judgement. The absence of a mandatory role for psychiatrists means that reversible psychopathology may be missed. As a result, the patient's decision to end his/her life may be more informed by treatable mental disorder than by his/her lifelong preferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psym.2012.03.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 67

Authors
McCormack, R., & Fléchais, R.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
319-326
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985667571
Cited by
67
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
assisted dying, psychiatrists, mental illness, assisted suicide legislation, psychiatric referral, decision-making capacity, major depressive disorder, end-of-life decisions, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Oregon, Washington
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Europe, Humans, Physician's Role, Psychiatry, Referral and Consultation, Stress, Psychological, United States, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review