Diurnal cortisol rhythm and fatigue in breast cancer survivors
Abstract
Approximately 30% of breast cancer survivors report persistent fatigue of unknown origin. We have previously shown that cancer-related fatigue is associated with alterations in immunological parameters and serum cortisol levels in breast cancer survivors. The current study examined the diurnal rhythm of salivary cortisol in fatigued and non-fatigued breast cancer survivors. Salivary cortisol measures were obtained from breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue (n=13) and a control group of non-fatigued survivors (n=16). Participants collected saliva samples upon awakening and at 1200, 1700, and 2200 h on two consecutive days. Diurnal cortisol slope for each day was determined by linear regression of log-transformed cortisol values on collection time and analyzed using multi-level modeling. Fatigued breast cancer survivors had a significantly flatter cortisol slope than non-fatigued survivors, with a less rapid decline in cortisol levels in the evening hours. At the individual patient level, survivors who reported the highest levels of fatigue also had the flattest cortisol slopes. Group differences remained significant in analyses controlling for demographic and medical factors, daily health behaviors, and other potential confounds (e.g. depressed mood, body mass index). Results suggest a subtle dysregulation in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning in breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flattening of the cortisol curve has been associated with fatigue in breast cancer survivors.
“Moreover, flattening of the cortisol curve has been associated with fatigue in breast cancer survivors.101”
From Cytokines and Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling (2009) · cites this paper as [101]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 308
- Authors
- Bower, J. E., Ganz, P. A., Dickerson, S. S., Petersen, L., Aziz, N., & Fahey, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bower, Julienne E.
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-100
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066823109
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH019925, T32MH019925)
- National Cancer Institute (K07CA090407)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Keywords
- breast cancer survivors, cancer-related fatigue, diurnal cortisol rhythm, salivary cortisol, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, cortisol slope
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Behavior, Breast Neoplasms, Circadian Rhythm, Depressive Disorder, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Saliva, Models, Statistical, Health Behavior, Survivors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review